Which has the lower trailing P/E, ED or XEL?

ED has the lower trailing P/E: ED trades at 17.48 and XEL at 20.57. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ED or XEL?

Over the past five years, ED grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.46% CAGR versus XEL at 2.79%.

Does ED or XEL pay a bigger dividend?

ED yields 3.29% and XEL yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ED or XEL more profitable?

XEL runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.53% versus XEL at 15.28%.

How have ED and XEL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ED delivered 7.67% and XEL delivered 9.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL)

A side-by-side comparison of Consolidated Edison, Inc. and Xcel Energy Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

$39.23B

$106.46UtilitiesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

XEL

Xcel Energy Inc.

$47.16B

$75.50UtilitiesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ED vs XEL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ED +104.2% (+7.4%/yr)XEL +146.3% (+9.4%/yr)XEL compounded faster over this window

ED XEL

ED vs XEL: by the numbers

•XEL is the larger company ($47.16B vs $39.23B market cap).
•ED trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.48 vs 20.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•XEL converts more revenue to profit (15.28% vs 12.53% net margin).
•ED grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.46% vs 2.79% CAGR).
•ED pays the higher dividend yield (3.29% vs 3.05%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ED	XEL
P/E ratio	17.48	20.57
Forward P/E	17.44	18.35
P/S ratio	2.22	3.23
P/B ratio	1.53	1.96
EV / EBITDA	12.59	13.98

Profitability

Metric	ED	XEL
Gross margin	62.02%	48.84%
Operating margin	17.98%	20.98%
Net margin	12.53%	15.28%
ROE	8.62%	9.28%
ROIC	3.37%	3.74%

Dividends

Metric	ED	XEL
Dividend yield	3.29%	3.05%
Payout ratio	57.68%	63.35%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ED	XEL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.46%	2.79%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.46%	4.20%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-15.80%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.19%	5.22%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ED or XEL?: ED has the lower trailing P/E: ED trades at 17.48 and XEL at 20.57. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ED or XEL?: Over the past five years, ED grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.46% CAGR versus XEL at 2.79%.
Does ED or XEL pay a bigger dividend?: ED yields 3.29% and XEL yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ED or XEL more profitable?: XEL runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.53% versus XEL at 15.28%.
How have ED and XEL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ED delivered 7.67% and XEL delivered 9.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ED analysis Full XEL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Consolidated Edison P/E ratio Xcel Energy P/E ratio Consolidated Edison dividend yield Xcel Energy dividend yield Consolidated Edison ROE Xcel Energy ROE Consolidated Edison operating margin Xcel Energy operating margin Consolidated Edison revenue growth Xcel Energy revenue growth Consolidated Edison free cash flow Xcel Energy free cash flow

Consolidated Edison & Xcel Energy appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.