Which has the lower trailing P/E, ED or VST?

ED has the lower trailing P/E: ED trades at 17.73 and VST at 61.13. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ED or VST?

Over the past five years, VST grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.46% CAGR versus VST at 7.52%.

Does ED or VST pay a bigger dividend?

ED yields 3.22% and VST yields 0.65% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ED or VST more profitable?

VST runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.53% versus VST at 16.67%.

How have ED and VST total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, ED delivered 7.11% and VST delivered 52.68% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs Vistra Corp. (VST)

A side-by-side comparison of Consolidated Edison, Inc. and Vistra Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

$39.79B

$107.98UtilitiesAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

VST

Vistra Corp.

$47.40B

$140.59UtilitiesAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — ED vs VST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ED +98.6%VST +963.8%VST compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ED VST

ED vs VST: by the numbers

•VST is the larger company ($47.40B vs $39.79B market cap).
•ED trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.73 vs 61.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•VST converts more revenue to profit (16.67% vs 12.53% net margin).
•VST grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.52% vs 6.46% CAGR).
•ED pays the higher dividend yield (3.22% vs 0.65%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ED	VST
P/E ratio	17.73	61.13
Forward P/E	17.69	15.51
P/S ratio	2.26	2.96
P/B ratio	1.70	8.58
PEG ratio	2.31	5.46
EV / EBITDA	12.68	20.40
FCF yield	12.69%	2.34%

Profitability

Metric	ED	VST
Gross margin	62.02%	17.52%
Operating margin	17.98%	7.93%
Net margin	12.53%	16.67%
ROE	9.41%	18.47%
ROIC	3.24%	3.30%

Dividends

Metric	ED	VST
Dividend yield	3.22%	0.65%
Payout ratio	61.40%	41.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ED	VST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.46%	7.52%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.46%	11.20%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-42.65%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.23%	52.68%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ED or VST?: ED has the lower trailing P/E: ED trades at 17.73 and VST at 61.13. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ED or VST?: Over the past five years, VST grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.46% CAGR versus VST at 7.52%.
Does ED or VST pay a bigger dividend?: ED yields 3.22% and VST yields 0.65% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ED or VST more profitable?: VST runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.53% versus VST at 16.67%.
How have ED and VST total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, ED delivered 7.11% and VST delivered 52.68% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ED analysis Full VST analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Consolidated Edison P/E ratio Vistra P/E ratio Consolidated Edison dividend yield Vistra dividend yield Consolidated Edison ROE Vistra ROE Consolidated Edison operating margin Vistra operating margin Consolidated Edison revenue growth Vistra revenue growth Consolidated Edison free cash flow Vistra free cash flow

Consolidated Edison & Vistra appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 8, 2026.