Is ED or VST cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ED is cheaper: ED trades at a 18.64 P/E and VST at 27.10.

Which has grown faster, ED or VST?

Over the past five years, VST grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.30% CAGR versus VST at 6.97%.

Does ED or VST pay a bigger dividend?

ED yields 3.14% and VST yields 0.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ED or VST more profitable?

VST runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.52% versus VST at 13.82%.

Which has been the better investment, ED or VST?

Over the past 5-year, VST delivered the higher annualized total return — ED at 7.29% versus VST at 57.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs Vistra Corp. (VST)

ED leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Consolidated Edison, Inc. and Vistra Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Total return — ED vs VST

growth of $100 · last 10y

ED +52.2%VST +950.8%VST compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ED VST

ED vs VST: by the numbers

•VST is the larger company ($54.92B vs $40.80B market cap).
•ED trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.64 vs 27.10 P/E).
•VST converts more revenue to profit (13.82% vs 12.52% net margin).
•VST grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.97% vs 6.30% CAGR).
•ED pays the higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 0.56%).

Which is better, ED or VST?

Metric tally: ED 11 · VST 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueED(lower P/E)

GrowthVST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeED(higher dividend yield)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ED	VST
P/E ratio	18.64●	27.10
Forward P/E	17.08	14.38●
P/S ratio	2.34●	3.41
P/B ratio	1.58●	9.89
PEG ratio	2.31●	2.42
EV / EBITDA	9.66●	11.48
FCF yield	6.98%●	2.03%

Profitability

Metric	ED	VST
Gross margin	65.01%●	12.72%
Operating margin	17.33%●	2.07%
Net margin	12.52%	13.82%●
ROE	8.42%	40.04%●
ROIC	3.24%	3.30%

Dividends

Metric	ED	VST
Dividend yield	3.14%●	0.56%
Payout ratio	61.40%	41.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ED	VST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.30%	6.97%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.46%●	11.20%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	47.32%●	-11.04%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.43%	57.80%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ED or VST?: It depends on your goal. value: ED (lower P/E); growth: VST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ED (higher dividend yield). Across all compared metrics, ED leads 11 to 5.
Is ED or VST cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ED is cheaper: ED trades at a 18.64 P/E and VST at 27.10.
Which has grown faster, ED or VST?: Over the past five years, VST grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.30% CAGR versus VST at 6.97%.
Does ED or VST pay a bigger dividend?: ED yields 3.14% and VST yields 0.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ED or VST more profitable?: VST runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.52% versus VST at 13.82%.
Which has been the better investment, ED or VST?: Over the past 5-year, VST delivered the higher annualized total return — ED at 7.29% versus VST at 57.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ED analysis Full VST analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Consolidated Edison P/E ratio Vistra P/E ratio Consolidated Edison dividend yield Vistra dividend yield Consolidated Edison ROE Vistra ROE Consolidated Edison operating margin Vistra operating margin Consolidated Edison revenue growth Vistra revenue growth Consolidated Edison free cash flow Vistra free cash flow

Consolidated Edison & Vistra appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.