Which has the lower trailing P/E, ED or PCG?

PCG has the lower trailing P/E: ED trades at 17.00 and PCG at 8.91. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ED or PCG?

Over the past five years, ED grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.46% CAGR versus PCG at 5.72%.

Does ED or PCG pay a bigger dividend?

ED yields 3.30% and PCG yields 1.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ED or PCG more profitable?

ED runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.53% versus PCG at 12.25%.

How have ED and PCG total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ED delivered 7.64% and PCG delivered -13.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs PG&E Corporation (PCG)

A side-by-side comparison of Consolidated Edison, Inc. and PG&E Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

$38.14B

$103.50UtilitiesDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 12:10 PM EDT

PCG

PG&E Corporation

$32.71B

$12.21UtilitiesDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 12:10 PM EDT

Total return — ED vs PCG

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ED +100.8% (+7.2%/yr)PCG -76.6% (-13.5%/yr)ED compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ED PCG

ED vs PCG: by the numbers

•ED is the larger company ($38.14B vs $32.71B market cap).
•PCG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.91 vs 17.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ED converts more revenue to profit (12.53% vs 12.25% net margin).
•ED grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.46% vs 5.72% CAGR).
•ED pays the higher dividend yield (3.30% vs 1.27%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ED	PCG
P/E ratio	17.00	8.91
Forward P/E	16.95	7.38
P/S ratio	2.16	1.27
P/B ratio	1.48	0.96
EV / EBITDA	12.39	9.97

Profitability

Metric	ED	PCG
Gross margin	62.02%	19.59%
Operating margin	17.98%	19.99%
Net margin	12.53%	12.25%
ROE	8.62%	9.34%
ROIC	3.37%	3.83%

Dividends

Metric	ED	PCG
Dividend yield	3.30%	1.27%
Payout ratio	57.68%	12.77%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ED	PCG
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.46%	5.72%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.46%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	5.43%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.12%	8.56%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ED or PCG?: PCG has the lower trailing P/E: ED trades at 17.00 and PCG at 8.91. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ED or PCG?: Over the past five years, ED grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.46% CAGR versus PCG at 5.72%.
Does ED or PCG pay a bigger dividend?: ED yields 3.30% and PCG yields 1.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ED or PCG more profitable?: ED runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.53% versus PCG at 12.25%.
How have ED and PCG total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ED delivered 7.64% and PCG delivered -13.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ED analysis Full PCG analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Consolidated Edison P/E ratio PG&E P/E ratio Consolidated Edison dividend yield PG&E dividend yield Consolidated Edison ROE PG&E ROE Consolidated Edison operating margin PG&E operating margin Consolidated Edison revenue growth PG&E revenue growth Consolidated Edison free cash flow PG&E free cash flow

Consolidated Edison & PG&E appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.