Which has the lower trailing P/E, ECL or WPM?

WPM has the lower trailing P/E: ECL trades at 38.32 and WPM at 31.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ECL or WPM?

Over the past five years, WPM grew revenue faster — ECL at a 6.78% CAGR versus WPM at 18.70%.

Does ECL or WPM pay a bigger dividend?

ECL yields 0.99% and WPM yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ECL or WPM more profitable?

WPM runs the higher net margin — ECL at 12.57% versus WPM at 65.55%.

How have ECL and WPM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ECL delivered 10.00% and WPM delivered 17.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ecolab Inc. (ECL) vs Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

A side-by-side comparison of Ecolab Inc. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ECL

Ecolab Inc.

$79.53B

$282.60Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 6, 2026, 11:15 AM EDT

WPM

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

$56.62B

$124.68Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 6, 2026, 11:15 AM EDT

Total return — ECL vs WPM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21y

ECL +1027.0%WPM +4674.3%WPM compounded faster

ECL WPM

ECL vs WPM: by the numbers

•ECL is the larger company ($79.53B vs $56.62B market cap).
•WPM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.02 vs 38.32 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WPM converts more revenue to profit (65.55% vs 12.57% net margin).
•WPM grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.70% vs 6.78% CAGR).
•ECL pays the higher dividend yield (0.99% vs 0.59%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ECL	WPM
P/E ratio	38.32	31.02
Forward P/E	34.99	25.27
P/S ratio	4.79	20.35
P/B ratio	8.03	6.03
PEG ratio	7.38	0.20
EV / EBITDA	26.41	23.58
FCF yield	2.31%	1.78%

Profitability

Metric	ECL	WPM
Gross margin	44.11%	77.10%
Operating margin	17.37%	71.81%
Net margin	12.57%	65.55%
ROE	21.05%	19.41%
ROIC	11.95%	15.60%

Dividends

Metric	ECL	WPM
Dividend yield	0.99%	0.59%
Payout ratio	38.74%	21.82%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ECL	WPM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.78%	18.70%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.19%	22.63%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.68%	-5.56%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.70%	23.40%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ECL or WPM?: WPM has the lower trailing P/E: ECL trades at 38.32 and WPM at 31.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ECL or WPM?: Over the past five years, WPM grew revenue faster — ECL at a 6.78% CAGR versus WPM at 18.70%.
Does ECL or WPM pay a bigger dividend?: ECL yields 0.99% and WPM yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ECL or WPM more profitable?: WPM runs the higher net margin — ECL at 12.57% versus WPM at 65.55%.
How have ECL and WPM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ECL delivered 10.00% and WPM delivered 17.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ECL analysis Full WPM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ecolab P/E ratio Wheaton Precious Metals P/E ratio Ecolab dividend yield Wheaton Precious Metals dividend yield Ecolab ROE Wheaton Precious Metals ROE Ecolab operating margin Wheaton Precious Metals operating margin Ecolab revenue growth Wheaton Precious Metals revenue growth Ecolab free cash flow Wheaton Precious Metals free cash flow

Ecolab & Wheaton Precious Metals appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 6, 2026.