Ecolab Inc. (ECL) vs Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
WPM leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Ecolab Inc. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ECL
Ecolab Inc.
$269.12Basic Materials
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
$122.57Basic Materials
Total return — ECL vs WPM
growth of $100 · last 21yECL +741.0%WPM +3828.5%WPM compounded faster
ECL WPM
ECL vs WPM: by the numbers
- •ECL is the larger company ($75.74B vs $55.66B market cap).
- •WPM trades at the lower earnings multiple (30.95 vs 36.42 P/E).
- •WPM converts more revenue to profit (65.55% vs 12.80% net margin).
- •WPM grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.70% vs 7.14% CAGR).
- •ECL pays the higher dividend yield (1.06% vs 0.59%).
Which is better, ECL or WPM?
Metric tally: ECL 4 · WPM 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWPM(lower P/E)
GrowthWPM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeECL(higher dividend yield)
QualityWPM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ECL | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.42 | 30.95● |
| Forward P/E | 32.38 | 21.66● |
| P/S ratio | 4.64● | 20.30 |
| P/B ratio | 7.63 | 6.01● |
| PEG ratio | 7.02 | 0.20● |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.99 | 22.31● |
| FCF yield | 2.45%● | 1.78% |
Profitability
| Metric | ECL | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.29% | 77.10%● |
| Operating margin | 17.49% | 71.81%● |
| Net margin | 12.80% | 65.55%● |
| ROE | 21.05%● | 19.41% |
| ROIC | 11.95% | 15.60%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ECL | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.06%● | 0.59% |
| Payout ratio | 38.74% | 21.82% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ECL | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.14% | 18.70%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.19% | 22.63%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.68% | 8.38%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.77% | 24.34%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ECL or WPM?
- It depends on your goal. value: WPM (lower P/E); growth: WPM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ECL (higher dividend yield); quality: WPM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WPM leads 13 to 4.
- Is ECL or WPM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WPM is cheaper: ECL trades at a 36.42 P/E and WPM at 30.95.
- Which has grown faster, ECL or WPM?
- Over the past five years, WPM grew revenue faster — ECL at a 7.14% CAGR versus WPM at 18.70%.
- Does ECL or WPM pay a bigger dividend?
- ECL yields 1.06% and WPM yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ECL or WPM more profitable?
- WPM runs the higher net margin — ECL at 12.80% versus WPM at 65.55%.
- Which has been the better investment, ECL or WPM?
- Over the past 10-year, WPM delivered the higher annualized total return — ECL at 9.72% versus WPM at 20.88%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ecolab P/E ratioWheaton Precious Metals P/E ratioEcolab dividend yieldWheaton Precious Metals dividend yieldEcolab ROEWheaton Precious Metals ROEEcolab operating marginWheaton Precious Metals operating marginEcolab revenue growthWheaton Precious Metals revenue growthEcolab free cash flowWheaton Precious Metals free cash flow
Ecolab & Wheaton Precious Metals appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.