DaVita Inc. (DVA) vs Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH)
ZBH leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though DVA is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of DaVita Inc. and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — DVA vs ZBH
growth of $100 · last 25yDVA +2849.1%ZBH +204.7%DVA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
DVA ZBH
DVA vs ZBH: by the numbers
- •ZBH is the larger company ($17.02B vs $13.34B market cap).
- •DVA trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.92 vs 22.85 P/E).
- •ZBH converts more revenue to profit (9.05% vs 5.65% net margin).
- •ZBH grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.21% vs 3.71% CAGR).
- •ZBH pays a dividend (1.09% yield) while DVA does not currently pay one.
Which is better, DVA or ZBH?
Metric tally: DVA 6 · ZBH 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueDVA(lower P/E)
GrowthZBH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityDVA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | DVA | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.92● | 22.85 |
| Forward P/E | 14.00 | 9.77● |
| P/S ratio | 1.04● | 2.05 |
| P/B ratio | — | 1.36 |
| PEG ratio | 2.54 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.93● | 11.00 |
| FCF yield | 10.43% | 10.66%● |
Profitability
| Metric | DVA | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.10% | 70.03%● |
| Operating margin | 15.01% | 15.61%● |
| Net margin | 5.65% | 9.05%● |
| ROE | -114.70% | 6.01%● |
| ROIC | 10.58%● | 5.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | DVA | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 1.09% |
| Payout ratio | — | 26.97% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | DVA | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.71% | 4.21%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.25%● | -7.05% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.13% | 15.41%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.32%● | -9.82% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, DVA or ZBH?
- It depends on your goal. value: DVA (lower P/E); growth: ZBH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: DVA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ZBH leads 8 to 6.
- Is DVA or ZBH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, DVA is cheaper: DVA trades at a 20.92 P/E and ZBH at 22.85.
- Which has grown faster, DVA or ZBH?
- Over the past five years, ZBH grew revenue faster — DVA at a 3.71% CAGR versus ZBH at 4.21%.
- Does DVA or ZBH pay a bigger dividend?
- ZBH pays a dividend (1.09% yield) while DVA does not currently pay one.
- Is DVA or ZBH more profitable?
- ZBH runs the higher net margin — DVA at 5.65% versus ZBH at 9.05%.
- Which has been the better investment, DVA or ZBH?
- Over the past 10-year, DVA delivered the higher annualized total return — DVA at 10.72% versus ZBH at -1.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
DaVita P/E ratioZimmer Biomet P/E ratioDaVita dividend yieldZimmer Biomet dividend yieldDaVita ROEZimmer Biomet ROEDaVita operating marginZimmer Biomet operating marginDaVita revenue growthZimmer Biomet revenue growthDaVita free cash flowZimmer Biomet free cash flow
DaVita & Zimmer Biomet appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.