Which has the lower trailing P/E, DVA or UHS?

UHS has the lower trailing P/E: DVA trades at 16.16 and UHS at 7.25. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, DVA or UHS?

Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — DVA at a 3.91% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.

Does DVA or UHS pay a bigger dividend?

UHS pays a dividend (0.46% yield), while DVA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is DVA or UHS more profitable?

UHS runs the higher net margin — DVA at 6.05% versus UHS at 8.42%.

How have DVA and UHS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, DVA delivered 11.05% and UHS delivered 4.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

DaVita Inc. (DVA) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)

A side-by-side comparison of DaVita Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

DVA

DaVita Inc.

$11.80B

$183.86HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

UHS

Universal Health Services, Inc.

$10.70B

$176.69HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — DVA vs UHS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

DVA +179.5% (+10.8%/yr)UHS +48.9% (+4.1%/yr)DVA compounded faster over this window

DVA UHS

DVA vs UHS: by the numbers

•DVA is the larger company ($11.80B vs $10.70B market cap).
•UHS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (7.25 vs 16.16 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•UHS converts more revenue to profit (8.42% vs 6.05% net margin).
•UHS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.21% vs 3.91% CAGR).
•UHS pays a dividend (0.46% yield), while DVA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DVA	UHS
P/E ratio	16.16	7.25
Forward P/E	12.39	7.84
P/S ratio	0.84	0.59
P/B ratio	N/A	1.42
EV / EBITDA	7.77	5.86
FCF yield	13.64%	7.73%

Profitability

Metric	DVA	UHS
Gross margin	31.02%	90.69%
Operating margin	15.06%	11.36%
Net margin	6.05%	8.42%
ROE	N/A	20.31%
ROIC	11.18%	11.74%

Dividends

Metric	DVA	UHS
Dividend yield	N/A	0.46%
Payout ratio	N/A	3.28%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DVA	UHS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.91%	8.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	8.25%	16.19%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.44%	-12.18%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.09%	3.74%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, DVA or UHS?: UHS has the lower trailing P/E: DVA trades at 16.16 and UHS at 7.25. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, DVA or UHS?: Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — DVA at a 3.91% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.
Does DVA or UHS pay a bigger dividend?: UHS pays a dividend (0.46% yield), while DVA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is DVA or UHS more profitable?: UHS runs the higher net margin — DVA at 6.05% versus UHS at 8.42%.
How have DVA and UHS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, DVA delivered 11.05% and UHS delivered 4.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DVA analysis Full UHS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

DaVita P/E ratio Universal Health Services P/E ratio Universal Health Services dividend yield DaVita ROE Universal Health Services ROE DaVita operating margin Universal Health Services operating margin DaVita revenue growth Universal Health Services revenue growth DaVita free cash flow Universal Health Services free cash flow

DaVita & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.