Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

A side-by-side comparison of Duolingo, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnDUOL vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y
DUOL +5.0% (+1.0%/yr)WULF -2.9% (-0.6%/yr)DUOL compounded faster over this window
0100200300400Start $10020222023202420252026$105$97
DUOL WULF

DUOL vs WULF: by the numbers

  • WULF is the larger company ($7.68B vs $6.80B market cap).
  • DUOL is profitable (35.87% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-1179.94%).
  • WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (73.75% vs 40.70% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricDUOLWULF
P/E ratio17.51N/A
Forward P/E51.71N/A
P/S ratio6.3845.58
P/B ratio5.1851.12
EV / EBITDA34.87N/A
FCF yield7.65%N/A

Profitability

MetricDUOLWULF
Gross margin72.34%56.40%
Operating margin14.18%-101.10%
Net margin35.87%-1179.94%
ROE29.14%-1323.42%
ROIC10.85%-6.87%

Growth (annualized)

MetricDUOLWULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)40.70%73.75%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)91.58%-2.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)2.97%-3.43%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, DUOL or WULF?
Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — DUOL at a 40.70% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.
Is DUOL or WULF more profitable?
DUOL runs the higher net margin — DUOL at 35.87% versus WULF at -1179.94%.
How have DUOL and WULF total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, DUOL delivered 2.97% and WULF delivered 4.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.