Which has the lower trailing P/E, DUOL or SIMO?

DUOL has the lower trailing P/E: DUOL trades at 16.38 and SIMO at 17.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, DUOL or SIMO?

Over the past five years, DUOL grew revenue faster — DUOL at a 42.21% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.

Does DUOL or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while DUOL has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is DUOL or SIMO more profitable?

DUOL runs the higher net margin — DUOL at 38.44% versus SIMO at 16.02%.

How have DUOL and SIMO total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, DUOL delivered 0.25% and SIMO delivered 18.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

A side-by-side comparison of Duolingo, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

DUOL

Duolingo, Inc.

$6.53B

$140.17TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SIMO

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

$7.04B

$209.68TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — DUOL vs SIMO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

DUOL +1.2%SIMO +299.6%SIMO compounded faster

DUOL SIMO

DUOL vs SIMO: by the numbers

•SIMO is the larger company ($7.04B vs $6.53B market cap).
•DUOL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.38 vs 17.24 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•DUOL converts more revenue to profit (38.44% vs 16.02% net margin).
•DUOL grew revenue faster over the past five years (42.21% vs 12.49% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while DUOL has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DUOL	SIMO
P/E ratio	16.38	17.24
Forward P/E	49.20	24.93
P/S ratio	6.27	2.10
P/B ratio	4.95	2.24
PEG ratio	0.06	0.17
EV / EBITDA	32.96	13.45
FCF yield	6.04%	0.34%

Profitability

Metric	DUOL	SIMO
Gross margin	72.14%	48.09%
Operating margin	14.78%	12.77%
Net margin	38.44%	16.02%
ROE	30.35%	18.76%
ROIC	9.80%	9.22%

Dividends

Metric	DUOL	SIMO
Dividend yield	N/A	0.90%
Payout ratio	N/A	13.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DUOL	SIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	42.21%	12.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	44.85%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	91.58%	-42.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	0.25%	31.92%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, DUOL or SIMO?: DUOL has the lower trailing P/E: DUOL trades at 16.38 and SIMO at 17.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, DUOL or SIMO?: Over the past five years, DUOL grew revenue faster — DUOL at a 42.21% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
Does DUOL or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while DUOL has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is DUOL or SIMO more profitable?: DUOL runs the higher net margin — DUOL at 38.44% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
How have DUOL and SIMO total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, DUOL delivered 0.25% and SIMO delivered 18.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DUOL analysis Full SIMO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Duolingo P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio Duolingo dividend yield Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield Duolingo ROE Silicon Motion Technology ROE Duolingo operating margin Silicon Motion Technology operating margin Duolingo revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth Duolingo free cash flow Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow

Duolingo & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.