Which has the lower trailing P/E, DT or FN?

FN has the lower trailing P/E: DT trades at 119.02 and FN at 35.53. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, DT or FN?

Over the past five years, DT grew revenue faster — DT at a 22.57% CAGR versus FN at 20.09%.

Is DT or FN more profitable?

FN runs the higher net margin — DT at 7.22% versus FN at 10.19%.

How have DT and FN total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, DT delivered -4.01% and FN delivered 34.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) vs Fabrinet (FN)

A side-by-side comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. and Fabrinet across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Dynatrace, Inc.

$17.29B

$59.31TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Fabrinet

$16.61B

$463.69TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — DT vs FN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

DT +148.7% (+13.9%/yr)FN +779.2% (+36.4%/yr)FN compounded faster over this window

DT FN

DT vs FN: by the numbers

•DT is the larger company ($17.29B vs $16.61B market cap).
•FN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.53 vs 119.02 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FN converts more revenue to profit (10.19% vs 7.22% net margin).
•DT grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.57% vs 20.09% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DT	FN
P/E ratio	119.02	35.53
Forward P/E	29.90	25.47
PEG ratio	7.56	1.32
P/S ratio	8.25	3.58
P/B ratio	7.05	6.77
EV / EBITDA	54.94	30.56
FCF yield	3.29%	0.02%

Profitability

Metric	DT	FN
Gross margin	81.37%	11.99%
Operating margin	13.03%	9.97%
Net margin	7.22%	10.19%
ROE	6.18%	19.27%
ROIC	5.60%	15.72%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DT	FN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.57%	20.09%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.87%	26.85%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	17.43%	-45.70%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-4.01%	34.67%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, DT or FN?: FN has the lower trailing P/E: DT trades at 119.02 and FN at 35.53. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, DT or FN?: Over the past five years, DT grew revenue faster — DT at a 22.57% CAGR versus FN at 20.09%.
Is DT or FN more profitable?: FN runs the higher net margin — DT at 7.22% versus FN at 10.19%.
How have DT and FN total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, DT delivered -4.01% and FN delivered 34.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DT analysis Full FN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Dynatrace P/E ratio Fabrinet P/E ratio Dynatrace ROE Fabrinet ROE Dynatrace operating margin Fabrinet operating margin Dynatrace revenue growth Fabrinet revenue growth Dynatrace free cash flow Fabrinet free cash flow

Dynatrace & Fabrinet appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 4, 2026.