Which has the lower trailing P/E, DRVN or PTON?

DRVN has the lower trailing P/E: DRVN trades at 11.20 and PTON at 38.25. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, DRVN or PTON?

Over the past five years, DRVN grew revenue faster — DRVN at a 7.23% CAGR versus PTON at -9.47%.

Is DRVN or PTON more profitable?

DRVN runs the higher net margin — DRVN at 9.86% versus PTON at 2.58%.

How have DRVN and PTON total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, DRVN delivered -16.54% and PTON delivered -42.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Driven Brands Holdings Inc. (DRVN) vs Peloton Interactive, Inc. (PTON)

A side-by-side comparison of Driven Brands Holdings Inc. and Peloton Interactive, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

DRVN

Driven Brands Holdings Inc.

$1.96B

$11.87Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:25 PM EDT

PTON

Peloton Interactive, Inc.

$2.08B

$4.98Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:25 PM EDT

Total return — DRVN vs PTON

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

DRVN -56.4% (-12.9%/yr)PTON -97.0% (-44.2%/yr)DRVN compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

DRVN PTON

DRVN vs PTON: by the numbers

•PTON is the larger company ($2.08B vs $1.96B market cap).
•DRVN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.20 vs 38.25 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•DRVN converts more revenue to profit (9.86% vs 2.58% net margin).
•DRVN grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.23% vs -9.47% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DRVN	PTON
P/E ratio	11.20	38.25
Forward P/E	9.93	15.44
P/S ratio	1.10	0.85
P/B ratio	2.35	N/A
EV / EBITDA	9.30	15.88
FCF yield	6.73%	18.99%

Profitability

Metric	DRVN	PTON
Gross margin	50.62%	52.61%
Operating margin	16.81%	7.61%
Net margin	9.86%	2.58%
ROE	21.14%	N/A
ROIC	9.42%	12.08%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DRVN	PTON
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.23%	-9.47%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	1.67%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-16.54%	-42.91%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, DRVN or PTON?: DRVN has the lower trailing P/E: DRVN trades at 11.20 and PTON at 38.25. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, DRVN or PTON?: Over the past five years, DRVN grew revenue faster — DRVN at a 7.23% CAGR versus PTON at -9.47%.
Is DRVN or PTON more profitable?: DRVN runs the higher net margin — DRVN at 9.86% versus PTON at 2.58%.
How have DRVN and PTON total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, DRVN delivered -16.54% and PTON delivered -42.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DRVN analysis Full PTON analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Driven Brands P/E ratio Peloton Interactive P/E ratio Driven Brands ROE Peloton Interactive ROE Driven Brands operating margin Peloton Interactive operating margin Driven Brands revenue growth Peloton Interactive revenue growth Driven Brands free cash flow Peloton Interactive free cash flow

Driven Brands & Peloton Interactive appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.