Driven Brands Holdings Inc. (DRVN) vs MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN)
A side-by-side comparison of Driven Brands Holdings Inc. and MillerKnoll, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
$11.88Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:55 AM EDT
MLKN
MillerKnoll, Inc.
$21.06Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:55 AM EDT
Total return — DRVN vs MLKN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yDRVN -56.4% (-12.9%/yr)MLKN -28.1% (-5.4%/yr)MLKN compounded faster over this window
DRVN MLKN
DRVN vs MLKN: by the numbers
- •DRVN is the larger company ($1.96B vs $1.43B market cap).
- •DRVN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.21 vs 14.93 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •DRVN converts more revenue to profit (9.86% vs 2.57% net margin).
- •DRVN grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.23% vs -0.67% CAGR).
- •MLKN pays a dividend (3.57% yield), while DRVN is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | DRVN | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.21 | 14.93 |
| Forward P/E | 9.93 | 10.44 |
| P/S ratio | 1.10 | 0.38 |
| P/B ratio | 2.35 | 1.06 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.30 | 5.30 |
| FCF yield | 6.73% | 8.05% |
Profitability
| Metric | DRVN | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.62% | 39.57% |
| Operating margin | 16.81% | 5.51% |
| Net margin | 9.86% | 2.57% |
| ROE | 21.14% | 7.22% |
| ROIC | 9.42% | 4.77% |
Dividends
| Metric | DRVN | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.57% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 53.19% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | DRVN | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.23% | -0.67% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 1.67% | 3.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -16.54% | -8.42% |
Some values include inputs from SEC filing.
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, DRVN or MLKN?
- DRVN has the lower trailing P/E: DRVN trades at 11.21 and MLKN at 14.93. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, DRVN or MLKN?
- Over the past five years, DRVN grew revenue faster — DRVN at a 7.23% CAGR versus MLKN at -0.67%.
- Does DRVN or MLKN pay a bigger dividend?
- MLKN pays a dividend (3.57% yield), while DRVN is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is DRVN or MLKN more profitable?
- DRVN runs the higher net margin — DRVN at 9.86% versus MLKN at 2.57%.
- How have DRVN and MLKN total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, DRVN delivered -16.54% and MLKN delivered -8.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Driven Brands P/E ratioMillerKnoll P/E ratioMillerKnoll dividend yieldDriven Brands ROEMillerKnoll ROEDriven Brands operating marginMillerKnoll operating marginDriven Brands revenue growthMillerKnoll revenue growthDriven Brands free cash flowMillerKnoll free cash flow
Driven Brands & MillerKnoll appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.