Which has the lower trailing P/E, DRS or TKR?

DRS has the lower trailing P/E: DRS trades at 30.67 and TKR at 33.18. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, DRS or TKR?

Over the past five years, DRS grew revenue faster — DRS at a 5.56% CAGR versus TKR at 4.20%.

Does DRS or TKR pay a bigger dividend?

DRS yields 0.98% and TKR yields 1.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is DRS or TKR more profitable?

DRS runs the higher net margin — DRS at 8.52% versus TKR at 5.43%.

How have DRS and TKR total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, DRS delivered 42.26% and TKR delivered 15.53% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) vs The Timken Company (TKR)

A side-by-side comparison of Leonardo DRS, Inc. and The Timken Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

DRS

Leonardo DRS, Inc.

$9.82B

$36.80IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TKR

The Timken Company

$8.51B

$122.44IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — DRS vs TKR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

DRS +3394.6% (+42.7%/yr)TKR +330.9% (+15.7%/yr)DRS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

DRS TKR

DRS vs TKR: by the numbers

•DRS is the larger company ($9.82B vs $8.51B market cap).
•DRS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.67 vs 33.18 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•DRS converts more revenue to profit (8.52% vs 5.43% net margin).
•DRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.56% vs 4.20% CAGR).
•TKR pays the higher dividend yield (1.16% vs 0.98%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DRS	TKR
P/E ratio	30.67	33.18
Forward P/E	26.66	19.51
PEG ratio	2.44	16.51
P/S ratio	2.60	1.79
P/B ratio	3.50	2.66
EV / EBITDA	20.67	13.24
FCF yield	3.70%	4.53%

Profitability

Metric	DRS	TKR
Gross margin	24.87%	28.67%
Operating margin	10.53%	11.19%
Net margin	8.52%	5.43%
ROE	11.49%	8.10%
ROIC	10.51%	6.64%

Dividends

Metric	DRS	TKR
Dividend yield	0.98%	1.16%
Payout ratio	30.00%	38.48%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DRS	TKR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.56%	4.20%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.00%	1.79%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.07%	-2.29%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.18%	14.78%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, DRS or TKR?: DRS has the lower trailing P/E: DRS trades at 30.67 and TKR at 33.18. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, DRS or TKR?: Over the past five years, DRS grew revenue faster — DRS at a 5.56% CAGR versus TKR at 4.20%.
Does DRS or TKR pay a bigger dividend?: DRS yields 0.98% and TKR yields 1.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is DRS or TKR more profitable?: DRS runs the higher net margin — DRS at 8.52% versus TKR at 5.43%.
How have DRS and TKR total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, DRS delivered 42.26% and TKR delivered 15.53% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DRS analysis Full TKR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Leonardo DRS P/E ratio Timken P/E ratio Leonardo DRS dividend yield Timken dividend yield Leonardo DRS ROE Timken ROE Leonardo DRS operating margin Timken operating margin Leonardo DRS revenue growth Timken revenue growth Leonardo DRS free cash flow Timken free cash flow

Leonardo DRS & Timken appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 3, 2026.