Which has the lower trailing P/E, DRS or RRX?

DRS has the lower trailing P/E: DRS trades at 30.67 and RRX at 32.90. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, DRS or RRX?

Over the past five years, RRX grew revenue faster — DRS at a 5.56% CAGR versus RRX at 14.45%.

Does DRS or RRX pay a bigger dividend?

DRS yields 0.98% and RRX yields 0.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is DRS or RRX more profitable?

DRS runs the higher net margin — DRS at 8.52% versus RRX at 5.35%.

How have DRS and RRX total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, DRS delivered 42.26% and RRX delivered 11.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) vs Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX)

A side-by-side comparison of Leonardo DRS, Inc. and Regal Rexnord Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

DRS

Leonardo DRS, Inc.

$9.82B

$36.80IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

RRX

Regal Rexnord Corporation

$10.64B

$159.87IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — DRS vs RRX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

DRS +3390.8% (+42.7%/yr)RRX +197.6% (+11.5%/yr)DRS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

DRS RRX

DRS vs RRX: by the numbers

•RRX is the larger company ($10.64B vs $9.82B market cap).
•DRS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.67 vs 32.90 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•DRS converts more revenue to profit (8.52% vs 5.35% net margin).
•RRX grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.45% vs 5.56% CAGR).
•DRS pays the higher dividend yield (0.98% vs 0.86%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DRS	RRX
P/E ratio	30.67	32.90
Forward P/E	26.66	15.07
PEG ratio	2.44	N/A
P/S ratio	2.60	1.76
P/B ratio	3.50	1.54
EV / EBITDA	20.67	12.52
FCF yield	3.70%	4.38%

Profitability

Metric	DRS	RRX
Gross margin	24.87%	37.75%
Operating margin	10.53%	11.74%
Net margin	8.52%	5.35%
ROE	11.49%	4.69%
ROIC	10.51%	4.62%

Dividends

Metric	DRS	RRX
Dividend yield	0.98%	0.86%
Payout ratio	30.00%	28.81%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DRS	RRX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.56%	14.45%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.00%	-1.96%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.07%	6.52%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.17%	1.73%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, DRS or RRX?: DRS has the lower trailing P/E: DRS trades at 30.67 and RRX at 32.90. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, DRS or RRX?: Over the past five years, RRX grew revenue faster — DRS at a 5.56% CAGR versus RRX at 14.45%.
Does DRS or RRX pay a bigger dividend?: DRS yields 0.98% and RRX yields 0.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is DRS or RRX more profitable?: DRS runs the higher net margin — DRS at 8.52% versus RRX at 5.35%.
How have DRS and RRX total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, DRS delivered 42.26% and RRX delivered 11.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DRS analysis Full RRX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Leonardo DRS P/E ratio Regal Rexnord P/E ratio Leonardo DRS dividend yield Regal Rexnord dividend yield Leonardo DRS ROE Regal Rexnord ROE Leonardo DRS operating margin Regal Rexnord operating margin Leonardo DRS revenue growth Regal Rexnord revenue growth Leonardo DRS free cash flow Regal Rexnord free cash flow

Leonardo DRS & Regal Rexnord appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.