Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)
LULU leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Domino's Pizza, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
DPZ
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
$323.88Consumer Cyclical
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
$118.77Consumer Cyclical
Total return — DPZ vs LULU
growth of $100 · last 19yDPZ +1560.9%LULU +748.4%DPZ compounded faster
DPZ LULU
DPZ vs LULU: by the numbers
- •LULU is the larger company ($13.49B vs $10.77B market cap).
- •LULU trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.62 vs 18.65 P/E).
- •LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 11.89% net margin).
- •LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 3.70% CAGR).
- •DPZ pays a dividend (1.69% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
Which is better, DPZ or LULU?
Metric tally: DPZ 3 · LULU 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLULU(lower P/E)
GrowthLULU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityDPZ(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | DPZ | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.65 | 9.62● |
| Forward P/E | 15.45 | 10.67● |
| P/S ratio | 2.20 | 1.22● |
| P/B ratio | — | 2.84 |
| PEG ratio | 4.60 | 0.40● |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.14 | 5.81● |
| FCF yield | 5.97% | 9.33%● |
Profitability
| Metric | DPZ | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 40.07% | 55.70%● |
| Operating margin | 19.59%● | 18.21% |
| Net margin | 11.89% | 13.03%● |
| ROE | -15.42% | 30.25%● |
| ROIC | 56.73%● | 22.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | DPZ | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.69% | — |
| Payout ratio | 30.92% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | DPZ | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.70% | 17.61%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 10.30% | 24.02%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.12% | 7.36%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -5.25%● | -18.88% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, DPZ or LULU?
- It depends on your goal. value: LULU (lower P/E); growth: LULU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: DPZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 12 to 3.
- Is DPZ or LULU cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: DPZ trades at a 18.65 P/E and LULU at 9.62.
- Which has grown faster, DPZ or LULU?
- Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — DPZ at a 3.70% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.
- Does DPZ or LULU pay a bigger dividend?
- DPZ pays a dividend (1.69% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
- Is DPZ or LULU more profitable?
- LULU runs the higher net margin — DPZ at 11.89% versus LULU at 13.03%.
- Which has been the better investment, DPZ or LULU?
- Over the past 10-year, DPZ delivered the higher annualized total return — DPZ at 11.12% versus LULU at 5.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Domino's Pizza P/E ratioLululemon Athletica P/E ratioDomino's Pizza dividend yieldLululemon Athletica dividend yieldDomino's Pizza ROELululemon Athletica ROEDomino's Pizza operating marginLululemon Athletica operating marginDomino's Pizza revenue growthLululemon Athletica revenue growthDomino's Pizza free cash flowLululemon Athletica free cash flow
Domino's Pizza & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.