Which has the lower trailing P/E, DOCU or SIMO?

SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: DOCU trades at 34.36 and SIMO at 19.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, DOCU or SIMO?

Over the past five years, DOCU grew revenue faster — DOCU at a 15.12% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.

Does DOCU or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.82% yield), while DOCU has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is DOCU or SIMO more profitable?

SIMO runs the higher net margin — DOCU at 9.59% versus SIMO at 16.02%.

How have DOCU and SIMO total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, DOCU delivered -29.42% and SIMO delivered 19.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

A side-by-side comparison of DocuSign, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

DOCU

DocuSign, Inc.

$10.69B

$55.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SIMO

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

$7.43B

$221.42TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — DOCU vs SIMO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

DOCU +33.2%SIMO +547.0%SIMO compounded faster

DOCU SIMO

DOCU vs SIMO: by the numbers

•DOCU is the larger company ($10.69B vs $7.43B market cap).
•SIMO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.04 vs 34.36 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 9.59% net margin).
•DOCU grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.12% vs 12.49% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.82% yield), while DOCU has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DOCU	SIMO
P/E ratio	34.36	19.04
Forward P/E	13.98	27.53
P/S ratio	3.16	2.32
P/B ratio	5.71	2.47
PEG ratio	N/A	0.17
EV / EBITDA	16.59	15.02
FCF yield	10.78%	0.31%

Profitability

Metric	DOCU	SIMO
Gross margin	79.40%	48.09%
Operating margin	10.64%	12.77%
Net margin	9.59%	16.02%
ROE	17.32%	18.76%
ROIC	12.04%	9.22%

Dividends

Metric	DOCU	SIMO
Dividend yield	N/A	0.82%
Payout ratio	N/A	13.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DOCU	SIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.12%	12.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	44.85%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.74%	-42.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-29.42%	35.17%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, DOCU or SIMO?: SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: DOCU trades at 34.36 and SIMO at 19.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, DOCU or SIMO?: Over the past five years, DOCU grew revenue faster — DOCU at a 15.12% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
Does DOCU or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.82% yield), while DOCU has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is DOCU or SIMO more profitable?: SIMO runs the higher net margin — DOCU at 9.59% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
How have DOCU and SIMO total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, DOCU delivered -29.42% and SIMO delivered 19.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DOCU analysis Full SIMO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

DocuSign P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio DocuSign dividend yield Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield DocuSign ROE Silicon Motion Technology ROE DocuSign operating margin Silicon Motion Technology operating margin DocuSign revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth DocuSign free cash flow Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow

DocuSign & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.