DeFi Technologies Inc. (DEFT) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)

A side-by-side comparison of DeFi Technologies Inc. and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnDEFT vs NMS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 2y
DEFT -71.6% (-46.7%/yr)NMS +7.1% (+3.5%/yr)NMS compounded faster over this window
50100150200250Start $10020252026$28$107
DEFT NMS

DEFT vs NMS: by the numbers

  • DEFT is the larger company ($198M vs $74M market cap).
  • DEFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.94 vs 10.78 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • NMS converts more revenue to profit (87.52% vs 68.79% net margin).
  • DEFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (211.89% vs 9.23% CAGR).
  • NMS pays a dividend (6.92% yield), while DEFT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricDEFTNMS
P/E ratio2.9410.78
P/S ratio2.459.52
P/B ratio1.290.88

Profitability

MetricDEFTNMS
Gross margin70.40%85.04%
Operating margin37.40%162.66%
Net margin68.79%87.52%
ROE24.93%8.57%
ROIC17.94%7.04%

Dividends

MetricDEFTNMS
Dividend yieldN/A6.92%

Growth (annualized)

MetricDEFTNMS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)211.89%9.23%
EPS CAGR (5Y)48.85%-22.02%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A-0.82%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, DEFT or NMS?
DEFT has the lower trailing P/E: DEFT trades at 2.94 and NMS at 10.78. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, DEFT or NMS?
Over the past five years, DEFT grew revenue faster — DEFT at a 211.89% CAGR versus NMS at 9.23%.
Does DEFT or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
NMS pays a dividend (6.92% yield), while DEFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is DEFT or NMS more profitable?
NMS runs the higher net margin — DEFT at 68.79% versus NMS at 87.52%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 13, 2026.