Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) vs Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA)
A side-by-side comparison of Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Murphy USA Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
$79.57Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 1, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
$511.37Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 1, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — DECK vs MUSA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yDECK +705.4% (+23.2%/yr)MUSA +632.5% (+22.0%/yr)DECK compounded faster over this window
DECK MUSA
DECK vs MUSA: by the numbers
- •DECK is the larger company ($10.84B vs $9.45B market cap).
- •DECK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.30 vs 15.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •DECK converts more revenue to profit (18.36% vs 2.87% net margin).
- •DECK grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.84% vs 9.42% CAGR).
- •MUSA pays a dividend (0.50% yield), while DECK has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | DECK | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.30 | 15.58 |
| Forward P/E | 10.58 | 14.65 |
| PEG ratio | 0.44 | 1.20 |
| P/S ratio | 1.96 | 0.44 |
| P/B ratio | 4.71 | 12.07 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.31 | 9.75 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 5.73% |
Profitability
| Metric | DECK | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 57.80% | 7.26% |
| Operating margin | 22.67% | 4.38% |
| Net margin | 18.36% | 2.87% |
| ROE | 44.09% | 78.86% |
| ROIC | 34.54% | 17.90% |
Dividends
| Metric | DECK | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.50% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 7.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | DECK | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.84% | 9.42% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 25.41% | 12.97% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 16.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.49% | 25.49% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, DECK or MUSA?
- DECK has the lower trailing P/E: DECK trades at 11.30 and MUSA at 15.58. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, DECK or MUSA?
- Over the past five years, DECK grew revenue faster — DECK at a 14.84% CAGR versus MUSA at 9.42%.
- Does DECK or MUSA pay a bigger dividend?
- MUSA pays a dividend (0.50% yield), while DECK has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is DECK or MUSA more profitable?
- DECK runs the higher net margin — DECK at 18.36% versus MUSA at 2.87%.
- How have DECK and MUSA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, DECK delivered 23.13% and MUSA delivered 22.15% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Deckers Outdoor P/E ratioMurphy USA P/E ratioMurphy USA dividend yieldDeckers Outdoor ROEMurphy USA ROEDeckers Outdoor operating marginMurphy USA operating marginDeckers Outdoor revenue growthMurphy USA revenue growthDeckers Outdoor free cash flowMurphy USA free cash flow
Deckers Outdoor & Murphy USA appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.