Which has the lower trailing P/E, DECK or LULU?

LULU has the lower trailing P/E: DECK trades at 11.14 and LULU at 8.06. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, DECK or LULU?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — DECK at a 14.84% CAGR versus LULU at 14.96%.

Is DECK or LULU more profitable?

DECK runs the higher net margin — DECK at 18.36% versus LULU at 12.78%.

How have DECK and LULU total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, DECK delivered 23.64% and LULU delivered 4.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

A side-by-side comparison of Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

DECK

Deckers Outdoor Corporation

$10.68B

$78.43Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$11.14B

$98.06Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — DECK vs LULU

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

DECK +710.3% (+23.3%/yr)LULU +49.6% (+4.1%/yr)DECK compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

DECK LULU

DECK vs LULU: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($11.14B vs $10.68B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.06 vs 11.14 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•DECK converts more revenue to profit (18.36% vs 12.78% net margin).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.96% vs 14.84% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DECK	LULU
P/E ratio	11.14	8.06
Forward P/E	10.43	10.11
P/S ratio	1.93	1.00
P/B ratio	4.64	2.32
EV / EBITDA	7.20	4.74
FCF yield	9.99%	12.16%

Profitability

Metric	DECK	LULU
Gross margin	57.80%	56.11%
Operating margin	22.67%	17.76%
Net margin	18.36%	12.78%
ROE	44.09%	29.60%
ROIC	34.54%	20.81%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DECK	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.84%	14.96%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	25.41%	24.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.18%	-1.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	3.23%	-25.29%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, DECK or LULU?: LULU has the lower trailing P/E: DECK trades at 11.14 and LULU at 8.06. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, DECK or LULU?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — DECK at a 14.84% CAGR versus LULU at 14.96%.
Is DECK or LULU more profitable?: DECK runs the higher net margin — DECK at 18.36% versus LULU at 12.78%.
How have DECK and LULU total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, DECK delivered 23.64% and LULU delivered 4.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DECK analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Deckers Outdoor P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Deckers Outdoor ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Deckers Outdoor operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Deckers Outdoor revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Deckers Outdoor free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Deckers Outdoor & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.