Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) vs Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT)
DECK leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Flutter Entertainment plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
$109.11Consumer Cyclical
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
$101.83Consumer Cyclical
Total return — DECK vs FLUT
growth of $100 · last 24yDECK +55067.4%FLUT +2021.5%DECK compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
DECK FLUT
DECK vs FLUT: by the numbers
- •FLUT is the larger company ($17.66B vs $15.15B market cap).
- •DECK is profitable (18.73% net margin) while FLUT runs a net loss (-2.91%).
- •FLUT grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.11% vs 16.52% CAGR).
Which is better, DECK or FLUT?
Metric tally: DECK 10 · FLUT 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthFLUT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityDECK(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | DECK | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 15.52 | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.57 | 12.25● |
| P/S ratio | 2.82 | 1.07● |
| P/B ratio | 6.18 | 2.01● |
| PEG ratio | 1.33 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.89● | 13.32 |
| FCF yield | 7.66%● | 4.00% |
Profitability
| Metric | DECK | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 57.31%● | 44.25% |
| Operating margin | 23.00%● | 2.40% |
| Net margin | 18.73%● | -2.91% |
| ROE | 40.97%● | -5.47% |
| ROIC | 32.39%● | 2.26% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | DECK | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.52% | 22.11%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 25.41%● | -36.84% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.95%● | 0.14% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.01%● | -11.50% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, DECK or FLUT?
- It depends on your goal. growth: FLUT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: DECK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, DECK leads 10 to 4.
- Which has grown faster, DECK or FLUT?
- Over the past five years, FLUT grew revenue faster — DECK at a 16.52% CAGR versus FLUT at 22.11%.
- Is DECK or FLUT more profitable?
- DECK runs the higher net margin — DECK at 18.73% versus FLUT at -2.91%.
- Which has been the better investment, DECK or FLUT?
- Over the past 10-year, DECK delivered the higher annualized total return — DECK at 27.71% versus FLUT at -0.93%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Deckers Outdoor P/E ratioFlutter Entertainment P/E ratioDeckers Outdoor dividend yieldFlutter Entertainment dividend yieldDeckers Outdoor ROEFlutter Entertainment ROEDeckers Outdoor operating marginFlutter Entertainment operating marginDeckers Outdoor revenue growthFlutter Entertainment revenue growthDeckers Outdoor free cash flowFlutter Entertainment free cash flow
Deckers Outdoor & Flutter Entertainment appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.