On trailing earnings, CX is cheaper: CX trades at a 1.60 P/E and RS at 25.18.

Which has grown faster, CX or RS?

Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus RS at 10.33%.

Does CX or RS pay a bigger dividend?

CX yields 1.02% and RS yields 1.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CX or RS more profitable?

RS runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus RS at 5.43%.

Which has been the better investment, CX or RS?

Over the past 10-year, RS delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.62% versus RS at 20.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) vs Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS)

CX leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.

$17.82B

$12.28Basic Materials

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

$19.69B

$385.78Basic Materials

Total return — CX vs RS

growth of $100 · last 27y

CX +67.3%RS +3304.9%RS compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CX RS

CX vs RS: by the numbers

•RS is the larger company ($19.69B vs $17.82B market cap).
•CX trades at the lower earnings multiple (1.60 vs 25.18 P/E).
•RS converts more revenue to profit (5.43% vs 2.74% net margin).
•RS grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.33% vs 4.55% CAGR).
•RS pays the higher dividend yield (1.30% vs 1.02%).

Which is better, CX or RS?

Metric tally: CX 11 · RS 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCX(lower P/E)

GrowthRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRS(higher dividend yield)

QualityRS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CX	RS
P/E ratio	1.60●	25.18
Forward P/E	13.37●	17.95
P/S ratio	0.11●	1.35
P/B ratio	0.14●	2.81
PEG ratio	0.02●	1.28
EV / EBITDA	2.60●	15.65
FCF yield	76.34%●	3.05%

Profitability

Metric	CX	RS
Gross margin	33.30%●	27.22%
Operating margin	12.07%●	7.52%
Net margin	2.74%	5.43%●
ROE	3.45%	11.32%●
ROIC	3.98%	8.16%●

Dividends

Metric	CX	RS
Dividend yield	1.02%	1.30%●
Payout ratio	1.89%	35.54%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CX	RS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.55%	10.33%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	102.72%●	19.64%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.36%●	-9.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.79%	22.21%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CX or RS?: It depends on your goal. value: CX (lower P/E); growth: RS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RS (higher dividend yield); quality: RS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CX leads 11 to 6.
Is CX or RS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CX is cheaper: CX trades at a 1.60 P/E and RS at 25.18.
Which has grown faster, CX or RS?: Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus RS at 10.33%.
Does CX or RS pay a bigger dividend?: CX yields 1.02% and RS yields 1.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CX or RS more profitable?: RS runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus RS at 5.43%.
Which has been the better investment, CX or RS?: Over the past 10-year, RS delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.62% versus RS at 20.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CX analysis Full RS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. P/E ratio Reliance Steel & Aluminum P/E ratio CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. dividend yield Reliance Steel & Aluminum dividend yield CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. ROE Reliance Steel & Aluminum ROE CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. operating margin Reliance Steel & Aluminum operating margin CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. revenue growth Reliance Steel & Aluminum revenue growth CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. free cash flow Reliance Steel & Aluminum free cash flow

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. & Reliance Steel & Aluminum appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.