Is CX or RPM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CX is cheaper: CX trades at a 1.86 P/E and RPM at 21.51.

Which has grown faster, CX or RPM?

Over the past five years, RPM grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus RPM at 5.79%.

Does CX or RPM pay a bigger dividend?

CX yields 1.01% and RPM yields 1.94% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CX or RPM more profitable?

RPM runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus RPM at 8.63%.

Which has been the better investment, CX or RPM?

Over the past 10-year, RPM delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.14% versus RPM at 10.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) vs RPM International Inc. (RPM)

CX leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and RPM International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 4, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.

$17.83B

$12.29Basic Materials

RPM

RPM International Inc.

$14.25B

$111.62Basic Materials

Total return — CX vs RPM

growth of $100 · last 27y

CX +67.4%RPM +766.6%RPM compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CX RPM

CX vs RPM: by the numbers

•CX is the larger company ($17.83B vs $14.25B market cap).
•CX trades at the lower earnings multiple (1.86 vs 21.51 P/E).
•RPM converts more revenue to profit (8.63% vs 2.74% net margin).
•RPM grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.79% vs 4.55% CAGR).
•RPM pays the higher dividend yield (1.94% vs 1.01%).

Which is better, CX or RPM?

Metric tally: CX 10 · RPM 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCX(lower P/E)

GrowthRPM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRPM(higher dividend yield)

QualityRPM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CX	RPM
P/E ratio	1.86●	21.51
Forward P/E	15.29●	20.30
P/S ratio	0.11●	1.85
P/B ratio	0.13●	4.53
PEG ratio	0.02●	1.21
EV / EBITDA	2.47●	14.86
FCF yield	56.82%●	4.04%

Profitability

Metric	CX	RPM
Gross margin	33.30%	41.36%●
Operating margin	12.07%	11.99%
Net margin	2.74%	8.63%●
ROE	3.45%	21.16%●
ROIC	3.98%	12.50%●

Dividends

Metric	CX	RPM
Dividend yield	1.01%	1.94%●
Payout ratio	1.89%	40.15%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CX	RPM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.55%	5.79%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	102.72%●	18.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.36%●	-3.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.65%●	6.28%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CX or RPM?: It depends on your goal. value: CX (lower P/E); growth: RPM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RPM (higher dividend yield); quality: RPM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CX leads 10 to 6.
Is CX or RPM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CX is cheaper: CX trades at a 1.86 P/E and RPM at 21.51.
Which has grown faster, CX or RPM?: Over the past five years, RPM grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus RPM at 5.79%.
Does CX or RPM pay a bigger dividend?: CX yields 1.01% and RPM yields 1.94% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CX or RPM more profitable?: RPM runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus RPM at 8.63%.
Which has been the better investment, CX or RPM?: Over the past 10-year, RPM delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.14% versus RPM at 10.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CX analysis Full RPM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. P/E ratio RPM International P/E ratio CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. dividend yield RPM International dividend yield CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. ROE RPM International ROE CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. operating margin RPM International operating margin CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. revenue growth RPM International revenue growth CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. free cash flow RPM International free cash flow

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. & RPM International appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 4, 2026.