Which has grown faster, CX or MSC?

Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — CX at a 3.73% CAGR versus MSC at 77.20%.

Does CX or MSC pay a bigger dividend?

CX pays a dividend (0.81% yield), while MSC has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CX or MSC more profitable?

CX runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.84% versus MSC at -5.63%.

How have CX and MSC total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CX delivered 6.51% and MSC delivered -29.08% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) vs Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC)

A side-by-side comparison of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and Studio City International Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CX is classified in Basic Materials; MSC is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.

$17.41B

$12.00Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MSC

Studio City International Holdings Limited

$85M

$1.77Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 3:08 PM EDT

Total return — CX vs MSC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

CX +103.1%MSC -88.7%CX compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CX MSC

CX vs MSC: by the numbers

•CX is the larger company ($17.41B vs $85M market cap).
•CX is profitable (2.84% net margin) while MSC runs a net loss (-5.63%).
•MSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (77.20% vs 3.73% CAGR).
•CX pays a dividend (0.81% yield), while MSC has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CX	MSC
P/E ratio	0.39	N/A
Forward P/E	14.57	N/A
P/S ratio	0.10	0.12
P/B ratio	0.14	0.17
PEG ratio	0.00	N/A
EV / EBITDA	0.32	6.89
FCF yield	76.34%	43.29%

Profitability

Metric	CX	MSC
Gross margin	33.66%	68.05%
Operating margin	12.85%	11.60%
Net margin	2.84%	-5.63%
ROE	3.85%	-7.94%
ROIC	3.98%	2.68%

Dividends

Metric	CX	MSC
Dividend yield	0.81%	N/A
Payout ratio	1.49%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CX	MSC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.73%	77.20%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	102.72%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-0.89%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	9.32%	-29.08%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CX or MSC?: Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — CX at a 3.73% CAGR versus MSC at 77.20%.
Does CX or MSC pay a bigger dividend?: CX pays a dividend (0.81% yield), while MSC has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CX or MSC more profitable?: CX runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.84% versus MSC at -5.63%.
How have CX and MSC total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CX delivered 6.51% and MSC delivered -29.08% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CX analysis Full MSC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. P/E ratio Studio City International P/E ratio CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. dividend yield Studio City International dividend yield CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. ROE Studio City International ROE CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. operating margin Studio City International operating margin CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. revenue growth Studio City International revenue growth CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. free cash flow Studio City International free cash flow

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. & Studio City International appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.