Which has grown faster, CX or MP?

Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.

Does CX or MP pay a bigger dividend?

CX pays a dividend (0.69% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Is CX or MP more profitable?

CX runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus MP at -20.48%.

Which has been the better investment, CX or MP?

Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.49% versus MP at 12.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) vs MP Materials Corp. (MP)

CX leads on 9 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and MP Materials Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.

$18.83B

$12.98Basic Materials

MP Materials Corp.

$10.25B

$57.55Basic Materials

Total return — CX vs MP

growth of $100 · last 6y

CX +350.7%MP +480.7%MP compounded faster

CX MP

CX vs MP: by the numbers

•CX is the larger company ($18.83B vs $10.25B market cap).
•CX is profitable (2.74% net margin) while MP runs a net loss (-20.48%).
•MP grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.90% vs 4.55% CAGR).
•CX pays a dividend (0.69% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CX or MP?

Metric tally: CX 9 · MP 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCX(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	CX	MP
P/E ratio	1.69	—
Forward P/E	13.96●	52.55
P/S ratio	0.11●	32.99
P/B ratio	0.14●	4.82
PEG ratio	0.02	—
EV / EBITDA	3.19●	619.59
FCF yield	71.94%	—

Profitability

Metric	CX	MP
Gross margin	33.30%●	24.16%
Operating margin	12.07%●	-39.42%
Net margin	2.74%●	-20.48%
ROE	3.45%●	-2.99%
ROIC	3.98%●	-2.36%

Dividends

Metric	CX	MP
Dividend yield	0.69%	—
Payout ratio	1.36%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CX	MP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.55%	14.90%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	102.72%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.36%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	9.84%	12.44%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CX or MP?: It depends on your goal. growth: MP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CX leads 9 to 2.
Which has grown faster, CX or MP?: Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.
Does CX or MP pay a bigger dividend?: CX pays a dividend (0.69% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.
Is CX or MP more profitable?: CX runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus MP at -20.48%.
Which has been the better investment, CX or MP?: Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.49% versus MP at 12.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CX analysis Full MP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. P/E ratio MP Materials P/E ratio CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. dividend yield MP Materials dividend yield CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. ROE MP Materials ROE CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. operating margin MP Materials operating margin CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. revenue growth MP Materials revenue growth CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. free cash flow MP Materials free cash flow

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. & MP Materials appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.