CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) vs International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF)
CX leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CX
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.
$12.98Basic Materials
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
$77.85Basic Materials
Total return — CX vs IFF
growth of $100 · last 27yCX +76.8%IFF +92.5%IFF compounded faster
CX IFF
CX vs IFF: by the numbers
- •IFF is the larger company ($19.88B vs $18.83B market cap).
- •CX trades at the lower earnings multiple (1.69 vs 23.81 P/E).
- •IFF converts more revenue to profit (7.90% vs 2.74% net margin).
- •IFF grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.71% vs 4.55% CAGR).
- •IFF pays the higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 0.76%).
Which is better, CX or IFF?
Metric tally: CX 12 · IFF 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCX(lower P/E)
GrowthIFF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeIFF(higher dividend yield)
QualityCX(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 1.69● | 23.81 |
| Forward P/E | 13.96● | 17.55 |
| P/S ratio | 0.11● | 1.85 |
| P/B ratio | 0.14● | 1.42 |
| PEG ratio | 0.02● | 0.19 |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.19● | 12.66 |
| FCF yield | 71.94%● | 1.99% |
Profitability
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.30% | 36.35%● |
| Operating margin | 12.07%● | 7.56% |
| Net margin | 2.74% | 7.90%● |
| ROE | 3.45% | 6.03%● |
| ROIC | 3.98%● | 3.19% |
Dividends
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 2.06%● |
| Payout ratio | 1.49% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.55% | 11.71%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 102.72%● | -25.13% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.36%● | -13.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.79%● | -9.58% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CX or IFF?
- It depends on your goal. value: CX (lower P/E); growth: IFF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: IFF (higher dividend yield); quality: CX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CX leads 12 to 5.
- Is CX or IFF cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CX is cheaper: CX trades at a 1.69 P/E and IFF at 23.81.
- Which has grown faster, CX or IFF?
- Over the past five years, IFF grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus IFF at 11.71%.
- Does CX or IFF pay a bigger dividend?
- CX yields 0.76% and IFF yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CX or IFF more profitable?
- IFF runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus IFF at 7.90%.
- Which has been the better investment, CX or IFF?
- Over the past 10-year, CX delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.64% versus IFF at -2.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. P/E ratioInternational Flavors & Fragrances P/E ratioCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. dividend yieldInternational Flavors & Fragrances dividend yieldCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. ROEInternational Flavors & Fragrances ROECEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. operating marginInternational Flavors & Fragrances operating marginCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. revenue growthInternational Flavors & Fragrances revenue growthCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. free cash flowInternational Flavors & Fragrances free cash flow
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. & International Flavors & Fragrances appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.