CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)
A side-by-side comparison of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CX is classified in Basic Materials; EPAC is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CX
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.
$12.00Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$37.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CX vs EPAC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 27yCX +147.2%EPAC +1146.2%EPAC compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CX EPAC
CX vs EPAC: by the numbers
- •CX is the larger company ($17.41B vs $1.91B market cap).
- •CX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (0.39 vs 19.71 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EPAC converts more revenue to profit (14.72% vs 2.84% net margin).
- •EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.10% vs 3.73% CAGR).
- •CX pays the higher dividend yield (0.81% vs 0.11%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CX | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 0.39 | 19.71 |
| Forward P/E | 14.57 | 18.70 |
| P/S ratio | 0.10 | 2.84 |
| P/B ratio | 0.14 | 4.24 |
| PEG ratio | 0.00 | 2.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.32 | 11.97 |
| FCF yield | 76.34% | 6.24% |
Profitability
| Metric | CX | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.66% | 49.05% |
| Operating margin | 12.85% | 21.76% |
| Net margin | 2.84% | 14.72% |
| ROE | 3.85% | 22.01% |
| ROIC | 3.98% | 15.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | CX | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.81% | 0.11% |
| Payout ratio | 1.49% | 2.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CX | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.73% | 5.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 102.72% | 169.53% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.89% | 34.85% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.32% | 6.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CX or EPAC?
- CX has the lower trailing P/E: CX trades at 0.39 and EPAC at 19.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CX or EPAC?
- Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — CX at a 3.73% CAGR versus EPAC at 5.10%.
- Does CX or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?
- CX yields 0.81% and EPAC yields 0.11% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CX or EPAC more profitable?
- EPAC runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.84% versus EPAC at 14.72%.
- How have CX and EPAC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CX delivered 6.51% and EPAC delivered 3.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. P/E ratioEnerpac Tool P/E ratioCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. dividend yieldEnerpac Tool dividend yieldCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. ROEEnerpac Tool ROECEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. operating marginEnerpac Tool operating marginCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. revenue growthEnerpac Tool revenue growthCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. free cash flowEnerpac Tool free cash flow
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. & Enerpac Tool appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.