Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) vs Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS)
A side-by-side comparison of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and Global Water Resources, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CWCO
Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.
$30.67UtilitiesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:24 PM EDT
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
$8.14UtilitiesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:25 PM EDT
Total return — CWCO vs GWRS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCWCO +238.4% (+13.0%/yr)GWRS +33.3% (+2.9%/yr)CWCO compounded faster over this window
CWCO GWRS
CWCO vs GWRS: by the numbers
- •CWCO is the larger company ($491M vs $234M market cap).
- •CWCO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.67 vs 73.97 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CWCO converts more revenue to profit (12.88% vs 5.22% net margin).
- •CWCO grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.88% vs 8.11% CAGR).
- •GWRS pays the higher dividend yield (3.79% vs 1.85%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CWCO | GWRS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 30.67 | 73.97 |
| Forward P/E | 33.70 | 84.25 |
| PEG ratio | 2.30 | 4.21 |
| P/S ratio | 3.85 | 3.90 |
| P/B ratio | 2.18 | 2.76 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.69 | 14.59 |
| FCF yield | 6.16% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | CWCO | GWRS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.26% | 44.86% |
| Operating margin | 12.23% | 13.60% |
| Net margin | 12.88% | 5.22% |
| ROE | 7.28% | 3.70% |
| ROIC | 6.10% | 1.29% |
Dividends
| Metric | CWCO | GWRS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 3.79% |
| Payout ratio | 56.00% | 276.08% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CWCO | GWRS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.88% | 8.11% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 13.15% | 17.51% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 52.76% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 23.47% | -13.53% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CWCO or GWRS?
- CWCO has the lower trailing P/E: CWCO trades at 30.67 and GWRS at 73.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CWCO or GWRS?
- Over the past five years, CWCO grew revenue faster — CWCO at a 13.88% CAGR versus GWRS at 8.11%.
- Does CWCO or GWRS pay a bigger dividend?
- CWCO yields 1.85% and GWRS yields 3.79% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CWCO or GWRS more profitable?
- CWCO runs the higher net margin — CWCO at 12.88% versus GWRS at 5.22%.
- How have CWCO and GWRS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CWCO delivered 13.11% and GWRS delivered 2.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Consolidated Water P/E ratioGlobal Water Resources P/E ratioConsolidated Water dividend yieldGlobal Water Resources dividend yieldConsolidated Water ROEGlobal Water Resources ROEConsolidated Water operating marginGlobal Water Resources operating marginConsolidated Water revenue growthGlobal Water Resources revenue growthConsolidated Water free cash flowGlobal Water Resources free cash flow
Consolidated Water & Global Water Resources appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.