Is CW or XYL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, XYL is cheaper: CW trades at a 55.49 P/E and XYL at 27.38.

Which has grown faster, CW or XYL?

Over the past five years, XYL grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus XYL at 12.66%.

Does CW or XYL pay a bigger dividend?

CW yields 0.16% and XYL yields 1.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CW or XYL more profitable?

CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus XYL at 10.70%.

Which has been the better investment, CW or XYL?

Over the past 10-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 24.85% versus XYL at 10.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Xylem Inc. (XYL)

XYL leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Xylem Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

Total return — CW vs XYL

growth of $100 · last 15y

CW +2345.2%XYL +353.9%CW compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CW XYL

CW vs XYL: by the numbers

•CW is the larger company ($28.00B vs $26.17B market cap).
•XYL trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.38 vs 55.49 P/E).
•CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 10.70% net margin).
•XYL grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.66% vs 8.60% CAGR).
•XYL pays the higher dividend yield (1.51% vs 0.16%).

Which is better, CW or XYL?

Metric tally: CW 6 · XYL 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueXYL(lower P/E)

GrowthXYL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeXYL(higher dividend yield)

QualityCW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CW	XYL
P/E ratio	55.49	27.38●
Forward P/E	44.41	19.89●
P/S ratio	7.79	2.95●
P/B ratio	10.67	2.44●
PEG ratio	1.94●	4.89
EV / EBITDA	35.32	15.56●
FCF yield	2.10%	3.61%●

Profitability

Metric	CW	XYL
Gross margin	37.17%	38.61%●
Operating margin	18.48%●	13.60%
Net margin	14.17%●	10.70%
ROE	19.42%●	8.87%
ROIC	12.41%●	6.42%

Dividends

Metric	CW	XYL
Dividend yield	0.16%	1.51%●
Payout ratio	9.43%	42.24%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CW	XYL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.60%	12.66%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.79%	22.76%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.67%	8.96%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	43.13%●	-0.21%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CW or XYL?: It depends on your goal. value: XYL (lower P/E); growth: XYL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: XYL (higher dividend yield); quality: CW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, XYL leads 11 to 6.
Is CW or XYL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, XYL is cheaper: CW trades at a 55.49 P/E and XYL at 27.38.
Which has grown faster, CW or XYL?: Over the past five years, XYL grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus XYL at 12.66%.
Does CW or XYL pay a bigger dividend?: CW yields 0.16% and XYL yields 1.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CW or XYL more profitable?: CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus XYL at 10.70%.
Which has been the better investment, CW or XYL?: Over the past 10-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 24.85% versus XYL at 10.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CW analysis Full XYL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio Xylem P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright dividend yield Xylem dividend yield Curtiss-Wright ROE Xylem ROE Curtiss-Wright operating margin Xylem operating margin Curtiss-Wright revenue growth Xylem revenue growth Curtiss-Wright free cash flow Xylem free cash flow

Curtiss-Wright & Xylem appear in these rankings

Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.