Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or XYL?

XYL has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 53.35 and XYL at 29.75. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CW or XYL?

Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus XYL at 5.48%.

Does CW or XYL pay a bigger dividend?

CW yields 0.13% and XYL yields 1.33% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CW or XYL more profitable?

XYL runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus XYL at 14.87%.

How have CW and XYL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CW delivered 24.06% and XYL delivered 11.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Xylem Inc. (XYL)

A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Xylem Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

$25.10B

$679.41IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

XYL

Xylem Inc.

$29.03B

$122.13IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CW vs XYL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 15y

CW +2614.8%XYL +527.4%CW compounded faster

CW XYL

CW vs XYL: by the numbers

•XYL is the larger company ($29.03B vs $25.10B market cap).
•XYL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.75 vs 53.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•XYL converts more revenue to profit (14.87% vs 14.17% net margin).
•CW grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.60% vs 5.48% CAGR).
•XYL pays the higher dividend yield (1.33% vs 0.13%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CW	XYL
P/E ratio	53.35	29.75
Forward P/E	47.85	22.24
P/S ratio	7.49	4.35
P/B ratio	10.26	2.84
PEG ratio	1.94	4.89
EV / EBITDA	35.26	23.04
FCF yield	2.19%	3.25%

Profitability

Metric	CW	XYL
Gross margin	37.17%	38.56%
Operating margin	18.48%	13.71%
Net margin	14.17%	14.87%
ROE	19.42%	9.69%
ROIC	12.41%	6.37%

Dividends

Metric	CW	XYL
Dividend yield	0.13%	1.33%
Payout ratio	7.57%	42.24%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CW	XYL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.60%	5.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.79%	22.76%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.67%	7.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	44.45%	1.55%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or XYL?: XYL has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 53.35 and XYL at 29.75. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CW or XYL?: Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus XYL at 5.48%.
Does CW or XYL pay a bigger dividend?: CW yields 0.13% and XYL yields 1.33% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CW or XYL more profitable?: XYL runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus XYL at 14.87%.
How have CW and XYL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CW delivered 24.06% and XYL delivered 11.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CW analysis Full XYL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio Xylem P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright dividend yield Xylem dividend yield Curtiss-Wright ROE Xylem ROE Curtiss-Wright operating margin Xylem operating margin Curtiss-Wright revenue growth Xylem revenue growth Curtiss-Wright free cash flow Xylem free cash flow

Curtiss-Wright & Xylem appear in these rankings

Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.