Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or VLTO?

VLTO has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 53.35 and VLTO at 24.87. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CW or VLTO?

Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus VLTO at 4.82%.

Does CW or VLTO pay a bigger dividend?

CW yields 0.13% and VLTO yields 0.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CW or VLTO more profitable?

VLTO runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus VLTO at 17.35%.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Veralto Corporation (VLTO)

A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Veralto Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

$25.23B

$683.08IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 2:35 PM EDT

VLTO

Veralto Corporation

$24.14B

$98.29IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 2:35 PM EDT

Total return — CW vs VLTO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3y

CW +261.0%VLTO +23.7%CW compounded faster

CW VLTO

CW vs VLTO: by the numbers

•CW is the larger company ($25.23B vs $24.14B market cap).
•VLTO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.87 vs 53.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•VLTO converts more revenue to profit (17.35% vs 14.17% net margin).
•CW grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.60% vs 4.82% CAGR).
•VLTO pays the higher dividend yield (0.49% vs 0.13%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CW	VLTO
P/E ratio	53.35	24.87
Forward P/E	47.85	23.16
P/S ratio	7.49	4.25
P/B ratio	10.26	8.17
PEG ratio	1.94	2.11
EV / EBITDA	35.26	18.14
FCF yield	2.19%	4.33%

Profitability

Metric	CW	VLTO
Gross margin	37.17%	60.18%
Operating margin	18.48%	22.74%
Net margin	14.17%	17.35%
ROE	19.42%	32.88%
ROIC	12.41%	16.15%

Dividends

Metric	CW	VLTO
Dividend yield	0.13%	0.49%
Payout ratio	7.57%	12.66%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CW	VLTO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.60%	4.82%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.79%	5.21%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.67%	1.00%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	44.45%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or VLTO?: VLTO has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 53.35 and VLTO at 24.87. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CW or VLTO?: Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus VLTO at 4.82%.
Does CW or VLTO pay a bigger dividend?: CW yields 0.13% and VLTO yields 0.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CW or VLTO more profitable?: VLTO runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus VLTO at 17.35%.

Go deeper

Full CW analysis Full VLTO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio Veralto P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright dividend yield Veralto dividend yield Curtiss-Wright ROE Veralto ROE Curtiss-Wright operating margin Veralto operating margin Curtiss-Wright revenue growth Veralto revenue growth Curtiss-Wright free cash flow Veralto free cash flow

Curtiss-Wright & Veralto appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.