Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or VLTO?

VLTO has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 38.44 and VLTO at 23.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CW or VLTO?

Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.25% CAGR versus VLTO at 4.82%.

Does CW or VLTO pay a bigger dividend?

CW yields 0.18% and VLTO yields 0.53% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CW or VLTO more profitable?

VLTO runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.81% versus VLTO at 17.35%.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Veralto Corporation (VLTO)

A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Veralto Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

$20.65B

$558.90IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

VLTO

Veralto Corporation

$22.94B

$94.10IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CW vs VLTO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3y

CW +181.1% (+41.1%/yr)VLTO +19.0% (+6.0%/yr)CW compounded faster over this window

CW VLTO

CW vs VLTO: by the numbers

•VLTO is the larger company ($22.94B vs $20.65B market cap).
•VLTO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (23.76 vs 38.44 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•VLTO converts more revenue to profit (17.35% vs 14.81% net margin).
•CW grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.25% vs 4.82% CAGR).
•VLTO pays the higher dividend yield (0.53% vs 0.18%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CW	VLTO
P/E ratio	38.44	23.76
Forward P/E	36.55	21.48
P/S ratio	5.65	4.03
P/B ratio	7.45	7.41
EV / EBITDA	26.38	17.60
FCF yield	3.03%	4.56%

Profitability

Metric	CW	VLTO
Gross margin	37.73%	60.18%
Operating margin	18.85%	22.74%
Net margin	14.81%	17.35%
ROE	19.54%	31.90%
ROIC	12.68%	14.70%

Dividends

Metric	CW	VLTO
Dividend yield	0.18%	0.53%
Payout ratio	6.74%	12.63%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CW	VLTO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.25%	4.82%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.79%	5.21%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.92%	1.00%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	38.11%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or VLTO?: VLTO has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 38.44 and VLTO at 23.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CW or VLTO?: Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.25% CAGR versus VLTO at 4.82%.
Does CW or VLTO pay a bigger dividend?: CW yields 0.18% and VLTO yields 0.53% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CW or VLTO more profitable?: VLTO runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.81% versus VLTO at 17.35%.

Go deeper

Full CW analysis Full VLTO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio Veralto P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright dividend yield Veralto dividend yield Curtiss-Wright ROE Veralto ROE Curtiss-Wright operating margin Veralto operating margin Curtiss-Wright revenue growth Veralto revenue growth Curtiss-Wright free cash flow Veralto free cash flow

Curtiss-Wright & Veralto appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.