Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL)
UAL leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
$762.59Industrials
UAL
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
$119.97Industrials
Total return — CW vs UAL
growth of $100 · last 20yCW +2482.4%UAL +280.0%CW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CW UAL
CW vs UAL: by the numbers
- •UAL is the larger company ($38.94B vs $28.17B market cap).
- •UAL trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.71 vs 55.83 P/E).
- •CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 6.06% net margin).
- •UAL grew revenue faster over the past five years (41.67% vs 8.60% CAGR).
- •CW pays a dividend (0.16% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CW or UAL?
Metric tally: CW 5 · UAL 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUAL(lower P/E)
GrowthUAL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CW | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 55.83 | 10.71● |
| Forward P/E | 44.68 | 8.32● |
| P/S ratio | 7.84 | 0.65● |
| P/B ratio | 10.74 | 2.47● |
| PEG ratio | 1.94 | 1.66● |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.53 | 7.17● |
| FCF yield | 2.09% | 8.18%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CW | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.17% | 64.24%● |
| Operating margin | 18.48%● | 8.44% |
| Net margin | 14.17%● | 6.06% |
| ROE | 19.42% | 23.09%● |
| ROIC | 12.41%● | 6.63% |
Dividends
| Metric | CW | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | — |
| Payout ratio | 9.43% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CW | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.60% | 41.67%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.79%● | -2.15% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.67% | 61.78%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 43.68%● | 16.76% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CW or UAL?
- It depends on your goal. value: UAL (lower P/E); growth: UAL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UAL leads 11 to 5.
- Is CW or UAL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UAL is cheaper: CW trades at a 55.83 P/E and UAL at 10.71.
- Which has grown faster, CW or UAL?
- Over the past five years, UAL grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus UAL at 41.67%.
- Does CW or UAL pay a bigger dividend?
- CW pays a dividend (0.16% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
- Is CW or UAL more profitable?
- CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus UAL at 6.06%.
- Which has been the better investment, CW or UAL?
- Over the past 10-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 25.23% versus UAL at 10.84%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Curtiss-Wright P/E ratioUnited Airlines P/E ratioCurtiss-Wright dividend yieldUnited Airlines dividend yieldCurtiss-Wright ROEUnited Airlines ROECurtiss-Wright operating marginUnited Airlines operating marginCurtiss-Wright revenue growthUnited Airlines revenue growthCurtiss-Wright free cash flowUnited Airlines free cash flow
Curtiss-Wright & United Airlines appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.