Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or SNA?

SNA has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 43.67 and SNA at 20.07. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CW or SNA?

Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.25% CAGR versus SNA at 5.42%.

Does CW or SNA pay a bigger dividend?

CW yields 0.15% and SNA yields 2.48% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CW or SNA more profitable?

SNA runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.81% versus SNA at 20.37%.

How have CW and SNA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CW delivered 22.17% and SNA delivered 12.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)

A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

$23.46B

$634.99IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

SNA

Snap-on Incorporated

$20.35B

$393.39IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — CW vs SNA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CW +641.1% (+22.2%/yr)SNA +226.2% (+12.6%/yr)CW compounded faster over this window

CW SNA

CW vs SNA: by the numbers

•CW is the larger company ($23.46B vs $20.35B market cap).
•SNA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.07 vs 43.67 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SNA converts more revenue to profit (20.37% vs 14.81% net margin).
•CW grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.25% vs 5.42% CAGR).
•SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.48% vs 0.15%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CW	SNA
P/E ratio	43.67	20.07
Forward P/E	41.50	20.58
P/S ratio	6.45	4.08
P/B ratio	8.51	3.43
EV / EBITDA	29.99	15.55
FCF yield	2.65%	5.06%

Profitability

Metric	CW	SNA
Gross margin	37.73%	51.21%
Operating margin	18.85%	23.78%
Net margin	14.81%	20.37%
ROE	19.54%	17.11%
ROIC	12.68%	12.35%

Dividends

Metric	CW	SNA
Dividend yield	0.15%	2.48%
Payout ratio	7.57%	50.00%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CW	SNA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.25%	5.42%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.79%	11.06%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.92%	0.01%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	40.58%	15.34%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or SNA?: SNA has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 43.67 and SNA at 20.07. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CW or SNA?: Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.25% CAGR versus SNA at 5.42%.
Does CW or SNA pay a bigger dividend?: CW yields 0.15% and SNA yields 2.48% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CW or SNA more profitable?: SNA runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.81% versus SNA at 20.37%.
How have CW and SNA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CW delivered 22.17% and SNA delivered 12.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CW analysis Full SNA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio Snap-on P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright dividend yield Snap-on dividend yield Curtiss-Wright ROE Snap-on ROE Curtiss-Wright operating margin Snap-on operating margin Curtiss-Wright revenue growth Snap-on revenue growth Curtiss-Wright free cash flow Snap-on free cash flow

Curtiss-Wright & Snap-on appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.