Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs nVent Electric plc (NVT)
NVT leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and nVent Electric plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CW vs NVT
growth of $100 · last 8yCW +446.3%NVT +574.2%NVT compounded faster
CW NVT
CW vs NVT: by the numbers
- •CW is the larger company ($28.36B vs $27.80B market cap).
- •CW trades at the lower earnings multiple (56.20 vs 57.30 P/E).
- •CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 11.33% net margin).
- •NVT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.38% vs 8.60% CAGR).
- •NVT pays the higher dividend yield (0.48% vs 0.13%).
Which is better, CW or NVT?
Metric tally: CW 7 · NVT 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthNVT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CW | NVT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 56.20 | 57.30 |
| Forward P/E | 44.98 | 30.05● |
| P/S ratio | 7.89 | 6.52● |
| P/B ratio | 10.81 | 7.43● |
| PEG ratio | 1.94 | 0.20● |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.77 | 32.49● |
| FCF yield | 2.08%● | 1.35% |
Profitability
| Metric | CW | NVT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.17% | 37.01% |
| Operating margin | 18.48%● | 15.92% |
| Net margin | 14.17%● | 11.33% |
| ROE | 19.42%● | 12.91% |
| ROIC | 12.41%● | 8.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | CW | NVT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 0.48%● |
| Payout ratio | 7.57% | 18.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CW | NVT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.60% | 16.38%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.79% | 22.34%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.67%● | 1.91% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 44.96%● | 42.38% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CW or NVT?
- It depends on your goal. growth: NVT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVT leads 8 to 7.
- Is CW or NVT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CW is cheaper: CW trades at a 56.20 P/E and NVT at 57.30.
- Which has grown faster, CW or NVT?
- Over the past five years, NVT grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus NVT at 16.38%.
- Does CW or NVT pay a bigger dividend?
- CW yields 0.13% and NVT yields 0.48% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CW or NVT more profitable?
- CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus NVT at 11.33%.
- Which has been the better investment, CW or NVT?
- Over the past 5-year, NVT delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 25.89% versus NVT at 42.38%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Curtiss-Wright P/E rationVent Electric P/E ratioCurtiss-Wright dividend yieldnVent Electric dividend yieldCurtiss-Wright ROEnVent Electric ROECurtiss-Wright operating marginnVent Electric operating marginCurtiss-Wright revenue growthnVent Electric revenue growthCurtiss-Wright free cash flownVent Electric free cash flow
Curtiss-Wright & nVent Electric appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.