Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or MTZ?

MTZ has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 50.62 and MTZ at 43.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CW or MTZ?

Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus MTZ at 17.90%.

Does CW or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?

CW pays a dividend (0.14% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is CW or MTZ more profitable?

CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus MTZ at 3.12%.

How have CW and MTZ total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CW delivered 23.18% and MTZ delivered 25.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs MasTec, Inc. (MTZ)

A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and MasTec, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

$25.55B

$691.52IndustrialsAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

MTZ

MasTec, Inc.

$21.88B

$272.46IndustrialsAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — CW vs MTZ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

CW +13001.8%MTZ +2304.1%CW compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CW MTZ

CW vs MTZ: by the numbers

•CW is the larger company ($25.55B vs $21.88B market cap).
•MTZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (43.45 vs 50.62 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 3.12% net margin).
•MTZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.90% vs 8.60% CAGR).
•CW pays a dividend (0.14% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CW	MTZ
P/E ratio	50.62	43.45
Forward P/E	45.41	29.67
P/S ratio	7.11	1.33
P/B ratio	9.74	6.18
PEG ratio	1.94	0.29
EV / EBITDA	33.51	17.51
FCF yield	2.31%	1.15%

Profitability

Metric	CW	MTZ
Gross margin	37.17%	11.47%
Operating margin	18.48%	5.79%
Net margin	14.17%	3.12%
ROE	19.42%	14.47%
ROIC	12.41%	7.44%

Dividends

Metric	CW	MTZ
Dividend yield	0.14%	N/A
Payout ratio	7.57%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CW	MTZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.60%	17.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.79%	2.94%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.67%	-16.61%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	42.27%	23.64%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or MTZ?: MTZ has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 50.62 and MTZ at 43.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CW or MTZ?: Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus MTZ at 17.90%.
Does CW or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?: CW pays a dividend (0.14% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is CW or MTZ more profitable?: CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus MTZ at 3.12%.
How have CW and MTZ total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CW delivered 23.18% and MTZ delivered 25.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CW analysis Full MTZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio MasTec P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright dividend yield MasTec dividend yield Curtiss-Wright ROE MasTec ROE Curtiss-Wright operating margin MasTec operating margin Curtiss-Wright revenue growth MasTec revenue growth Curtiss-Wright free cash flow MasTec free cash flow

Curtiss-Wright & MasTec appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 8, 2026.