Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs MasTec, Inc. (MTZ)
CW leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and MasTec, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CW vs MTZ
growth of $100 · last 30yCW +11440.4%MTZ +3278.8%CW compounded faster
CW MTZ
CW vs MTZ: by the numbers
- •MTZ is the larger company ($31.07B vs $28.26B market cap).
- •CW trades at the lower earnings multiple (56.01 vs 68.85 P/E).
- •CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 3.00% net margin).
- •MTZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.00% vs 8.60% CAGR).
- •CW pays a dividend (0.13% yield) while MTZ does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CW or MTZ?
Metric tally: CW 10 · MTZ 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCW(lower P/E)
GrowthMTZ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CW | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 56.01● | 68.85 |
| Forward P/E | 44.83 | 33.77● |
| P/S ratio | 7.86 | 2.03● |
| P/B ratio | 10.77 | 9.36● |
| PEG ratio | 1.94 | 0.29● |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.65 | 29.66● |
| FCF yield | 2.08%● | 0.83% |
Profitability
| Metric | CW | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.17%● | 11.30% |
| Operating margin | 18.48%● | 5.65% |
| Net margin | 14.17%● | 3.00% |
| ROE | 19.42%● | 13.86% |
| ROIC | 12.41%● | 7.44% |
Dividends
| Metric | CW | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | — |
| Payout ratio | 7.57% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CW | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.60% | 18.00%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.79%● | 2.94% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.67%● | -19.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 45.19%● | 29.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CW or MTZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: CW (lower P/E); growth: MTZ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CW leads 10 to 6.
- Is CW or MTZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CW is cheaper: CW trades at a 56.01 P/E and MTZ at 68.85.
- Which has grown faster, CW or MTZ?
- Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus MTZ at 18.00%.
- Does CW or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?
- CW pays a dividend (0.13% yield) while MTZ does not currently pay one.
- Is CW or MTZ more profitable?
- CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus MTZ at 3.00%.
- Which has been the better investment, CW or MTZ?
- Over the past 10-year, MTZ delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 25.17% versus MTZ at 33.32%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Curtiss-Wright P/E ratioMasTec P/E ratioCurtiss-Wright dividend yieldMasTec dividend yieldCurtiss-Wright ROEMasTec ROECurtiss-Wright operating marginMasTec operating marginCurtiss-Wright revenue growthMasTec revenue growthCurtiss-Wright free cash flowMasTec free cash flow
Curtiss-Wright & MasTec appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.