Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or MTZ?

MTZ has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 37.53 and MTZ at 34.44. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CW or MTZ?

Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.25% CAGR versus MTZ at 17.90%.

Does CW or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?

CW pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is CW or MTZ more profitable?

CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.81% versus MTZ at 3.12%.

How have CW and MTZ total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CW delivered 20.15% and MTZ delivered 21.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs MasTec, Inc. (MTZ)

A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and MasTec, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

$20.16B

$545.64IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MTZ

MasTec, Inc.

$17.34B

$215.93IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CW vs MTZ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CW +535.7% (+20.3%/yr)MTZ +627.0% (+21.9%/yr)MTZ compounded faster over this window

CW MTZ

CW vs MTZ: by the numbers

•CW is the larger company ($20.16B vs $17.34B market cap).
•MTZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.44 vs 37.53 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CW converts more revenue to profit (14.81% vs 3.12% net margin).
•MTZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.90% vs 8.25% CAGR).
•CW pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CW	MTZ
P/E ratio	37.53	34.44
Forward P/E	35.65	23.21
PEG ratio	1.72	11.60
P/S ratio	5.52	1.08
P/B ratio	7.28	4.99
EV / EBITDA	25.77	14.53
FCF yield	3.10%	1.41%

Profitability

Metric	CW	MTZ
Gross margin	37.73%	11.47%
Operating margin	18.85%	5.79%
Net margin	14.81%	3.12%
ROE	19.54%	14.47%
ROIC	12.68%	10.64%

Dividends

Metric	CW	MTZ
Dividend yield	0.18%	N/A
Payout ratio	6.88%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CW	MTZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.25%	17.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.79%	2.94%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.92%	-16.75%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	34.01%	19.31%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or MTZ?: MTZ has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 37.53 and MTZ at 34.44. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CW or MTZ?: Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.25% CAGR versus MTZ at 17.90%.
Does CW or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?: CW pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is CW or MTZ more profitable?: CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.81% versus MTZ at 3.12%.
How have CW and MTZ total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CW delivered 20.15% and MTZ delivered 21.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CW analysis Full MTZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio MasTec P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright dividend yield Curtiss-Wright ROE MasTec ROE Curtiss-Wright operating margin MasTec operating margin Curtiss-Wright revenue growth MasTec revenue growth Curtiss-Wright free cash flow MasTec free cash flow

Curtiss-Wright & MasTec appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 3, 2026.