Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs MTU Aero Engines AG (MTUAY)
A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and MTU Aero Engines AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
$596.37IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MTUAY
MTU Aero Engines AG
$207.46IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 3:58 PM EDT
Total return — CW vs MTUAY
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCW +603.4% (+21.5%/yr)MTUAY +354.2% (+16.3%/yr)CW compounded faster over this window
CW MTUAY
CW vs MTUAY: by the numbers
- •MTUAY is the larger company ($22.35B vs $22.03B market cap).
- •MTUAY trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.32 vs 41.64 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CW converts more revenue to profit (14.81% vs 12.07% net margin).
- •MTUAY grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.27% vs 8.25% CAGR).
- •MTUAY pays the higher dividend yield (1.01% vs 0.16%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CW | MTUAY |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 41.64 | 10.32 |
| Forward P/E | 39.57 | 22.10 |
| P/S ratio | 6.15 | 2.30 |
| P/B ratio | 8.11 | 4.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.64 | 11.86 |
| FCF yield | 2.78% | 2.50% |
Profitability
| Metric | CW | MTUAY |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.73% | 20.05% |
| Operating margin | 18.85% | 15.11% |
| Net margin | 14.81% | 12.07% |
| ROE | 19.54% | 23.56% |
| ROIC | 12.68% | 12.01% |
Dividends
| Metric | CW | MTUAY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | 1.01% |
| Payout ratio | 7.57% | 19.83% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CW | MTUAY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.25% | 15.27% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.79% | 46.14% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.92% | 29.07% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 38.02% | 13.56% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CW or MTUAY?
- MTUAY has the lower trailing P/E: CW trades at 41.64 and MTUAY at 10.32. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CW or MTUAY?
- Over the past five years, MTUAY grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.25% CAGR versus MTUAY at 15.27%.
- Does CW or MTUAY pay a bigger dividend?
- CW yields 0.16% and MTUAY yields 1.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CW or MTUAY more profitable?
- CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.81% versus MTUAY at 12.07%.
- How have CW and MTUAY total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CW delivered 21.53% and MTUAY delivered 16.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Curtiss-Wright P/E ratioMTU Aero Engines AG P/E ratioCurtiss-Wright dividend yieldMTU Aero Engines AG dividend yieldCurtiss-Wright ROEMTU Aero Engines AG ROECurtiss-Wright operating marginMTU Aero Engines AG operating marginCurtiss-Wright revenue growthMTU Aero Engines AG revenue growthCurtiss-Wright free cash flowMTU Aero Engines AG free cash flow
Curtiss-Wright & MTU Aero Engines AG appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.