Is CW or HUBB cheaper?

On trailing earnings, HUBB is cheaper: CW trades at a 55.49 P/E and HUBB at 28.17.

Which has grown faster, CW or HUBB?

Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus HUBB at 8.15%.

Does CW or HUBB pay a bigger dividend?

CW yields 0.16% and HUBB yields 1.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CW or HUBB more profitable?

HUBB runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus HUBB at 15.10%.

Which has been the better investment, CW or HUBB?

Over the past 10-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 24.85% versus HUBB at 19.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB)

HUBB leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Hubbell Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

Total return — CW vs HUBB

growth of $100 · last 30y

CW +11454.9%HUBB +1252.9%CW compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CW HUBB

CW vs HUBB: by the numbers

•CW is the larger company ($28.00B vs $25.20B market cap).
•HUBB trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.17 vs 55.49 P/E).
•HUBB converts more revenue to profit (15.10% vs 14.17% net margin).
•CW grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.60% vs 8.15% CAGR).
•HUBB pays the higher dividend yield (1.17% vs 0.16%).

Which is better, CW or HUBB?

Metric tally: CW 4 · HUBB 13

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueHUBB(lower P/E)

GrowthCW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeHUBB(higher dividend yield)

QualityHUBB(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CW	HUBB
P/E ratio	55.49	28.17●
Forward P/E	44.41	24.14●
P/S ratio	7.79	4.24●
P/B ratio	10.67	6.73●
PEG ratio	1.94	1.78●
EV / EBITDA	35.32	19.26●
FCF yield	2.10%	3.58%●

Profitability

Metric	CW	HUBB
Gross margin	37.17%●	35.52%
Operating margin	18.48%	20.77%●
Net margin	14.17%	15.10%●
ROE	19.42%	23.97%●
ROIC	12.41%	13.76%●

Dividends

Metric	CW	HUBB
Dividend yield	0.16%	1.17%●
Payout ratio	9.43%	33.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CW	HUBB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.60%●	8.15%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.79%●	20.82%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.67%	12.34%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	43.13%●	22.81%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CW or HUBB?: It depends on your goal. value: HUBB (lower P/E); growth: CW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: HUBB (higher dividend yield); quality: HUBB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, HUBB leads 13 to 4.
Is CW or HUBB cheaper?: On trailing earnings, HUBB is cheaper: CW trades at a 55.49 P/E and HUBB at 28.17.
Which has grown faster, CW or HUBB?: Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus HUBB at 8.15%.
Does CW or HUBB pay a bigger dividend?: CW yields 0.16% and HUBB yields 1.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CW or HUBB more profitable?: HUBB runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus HUBB at 15.10%.
Which has been the better investment, CW or HUBB?: Over the past 10-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 24.85% versus HUBB at 19.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CW analysis Full HUBB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio Hubbell P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright dividend yield Hubbell dividend yield Curtiss-Wright ROE Hubbell ROE Curtiss-Wright operating margin Hubbell operating margin Curtiss-Wright revenue growth Hubbell revenue growth Curtiss-Wright free cash flow Hubbell free cash flow

Curtiss-Wright & Hubbell appear in these rankings

Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.