Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD)
EXPD leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
$762.59Industrials
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
$163.23Industrials
Total return — CW vs EXPD
growth of $100 · last 30yCW +11524.8%EXPD +8819.7%CW compounded faster
CW EXPD
CW vs EXPD: by the numbers
- •CW is the larger company ($28.17B vs $21.35B market cap).
- •EXPD trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.41 vs 55.83 P/E).
- •CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 7.48% net margin).
- •CW grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.60% vs 0.10% CAGR).
- •EXPD pays the higher dividend yield (0.97% vs 0.16%).
Which is better, CW or EXPD?
Metric tally: CW 8 · EXPD 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueEXPD(lower P/E)
GrowthCW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeEXPD(higher dividend yield)
QualityEXPD(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CW | EXPD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 55.83 | 26.41● |
| Forward P/E | 44.68 | 24.07● |
| P/S ratio | 7.84 | 1.96● |
| P/B ratio | 10.74 | 9.58● |
| PEG ratio | 1.94● | 6.50 |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.53 | 18.13● |
| FCF yield | 2.09% | 4.21%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CW | EXPD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.17%● | 20.23% |
| Operating margin | 18.48%● | 9.67% |
| Net margin | 14.17%● | 7.48% |
| ROE | 19.42% | 36.62%● |
| ROIC | 12.41% | 26.65%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CW | EXPD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | 0.97%● |
| Payout ratio | 9.43% | 26.47% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CW | EXPD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.60%● | 0.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.79%● | 7.60% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.67%● | 2.95% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 43.68%● | 6.63% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CW or EXPD?
- It depends on your goal. value: EXPD (lower P/E); growth: CW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: EXPD (higher dividend yield); quality: EXPD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EXPD leads 9 to 8.
- Is CW or EXPD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, EXPD is cheaper: CW trades at a 55.83 P/E and EXPD at 26.41.
- Which has grown faster, CW or EXPD?
- Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus EXPD at 0.10%.
- Does CW or EXPD pay a bigger dividend?
- CW yields 0.16% and EXPD yields 0.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CW or EXPD more profitable?
- CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus EXPD at 7.48%.
- Which has been the better investment, CW or EXPD?
- Over the past 10-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 25.23% versus EXPD at 14.36%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Curtiss-Wright P/E ratioExpeditors International of Washington P/E ratioCurtiss-Wright dividend yieldExpeditors International of Washington dividend yieldCurtiss-Wright ROEExpeditors International of Washington ROECurtiss-Wright operating marginExpeditors International of Washington operating marginCurtiss-Wright revenue growthExpeditors International of Washington revenue growthCurtiss-Wright free cash flowExpeditors International of Washington free cash flow
Curtiss-Wright & Expeditors International of Washington appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.