Which has the lower trailing P/E, CVV or GTEC?

GTEC has the lower trailing P/E: CVV trades at 3.01 and GTEC at 1.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CVV or GTEC?

Over the past five years, CVV grew revenue faster — CVV at a 2.09% CAGR versus GTEC at 1.96%.

Is CVV or GTEC more profitable?

CVV runs the higher net margin — CVV at 62.01% versus GTEC at 12.32%.

How have CVV and GTEC total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CVV delivered -1.26% and GTEC delivered -33.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) vs Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation (GTEC)

A side-by-side comparison of CVD Equipment Corporation and Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CVV

CVD Equipment Corporation

$30M

$4.32IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:59 PM EDT

GTEC

Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation

$21M

$0.81IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:55 PM EDT

Total return — CVV vs GTEC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

CVV -41.4% (-6.5%/yr)GTEC -91.8% (-26.8%/yr)CVV compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CVV GTEC

CVV vs GTEC: by the numbers

•CVV is the larger company ($30M vs $21M market cap).
•GTEC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (1.35 vs 3.01 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CVV converts more revenue to profit (62.01% vs 12.32% net margin).
•CVV grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.09% vs 1.96% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CVV	GTEC
P/E ratio	3.01	1.35
Forward P/E	N/A	1.37
P/S ratio	1.86	0.21
P/B ratio	0.83	0.24
FCF yield	1.54%	68.90%

Profitability

Metric	CVV	GTEC
Gross margin	24.73%	32.89%
Operating margin	-6.77%	8.29%
Net margin	62.01%	12.32%
ROE	27.79%	14.26%
ROIC	-11.85%	13.08%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CVV	GTEC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.09%	1.96%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-14.29%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-1.26%	-33.89%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CVV or GTEC?: GTEC has the lower trailing P/E: CVV trades at 3.01 and GTEC at 1.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CVV or GTEC?: Over the past five years, CVV grew revenue faster — CVV at a 2.09% CAGR versus GTEC at 1.96%.
Is CVV or GTEC more profitable?: CVV runs the higher net margin — CVV at 62.01% versus GTEC at 12.32%.
How have CVV and GTEC total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CVV delivered -1.26% and GTEC delivered -33.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CVV analysis Full GTEC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CVD Equipment P/E ratio Greenland Technologies P/E ratio CVD Equipment ROE Greenland Technologies ROE CVD Equipment operating margin Greenland Technologies operating margin CVD Equipment revenue growth Greenland Technologies revenue growth CVD Equipment free cash flow Greenland Technologies free cash flow

CVD Equipment & Greenland Technologies appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.