Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) vs Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX)
A side-by-side comparison of Cavco Industries, Inc. and Garrett Motion Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CVCO
Cavco Industries, Inc.
$574.77Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:35 AM EDT
GTX
Garrett Motion Inc.
$26.12Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:35 AM EDT
Total return — CVCO vs GTX
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yCVCO +130.6% (+11.0%/yr)GTX +43.5% (+4.6%/yr)CVCO compounded faster over this window
CVCO GTX
CVCO vs GTX: by the numbers
- •GTX is the larger company ($4.87B vs $4.43B market cap).
- •GTX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.28 vs 25.01 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •GTX converts more revenue to profit (9.51% vs 7.89% net margin).
- •CVCO grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.93% vs 0.05% CAGR).
- •GTX pays a dividend (1.20% yield), while CVCO has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CVCO | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.01 | 14.28 |
| Forward P/E | 25.48 | 13.18 |
| PEG ratio | 1.05 | 1.86 |
| P/S ratio | 1.93 | 1.30 |
| P/B ratio | 3.99 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.21 | 12.21 |
| FCF yield | 5.30% | 7.49% |
Profitability
| Metric | CVCO | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 23.15% | 19.47% |
| Operating margin | 9.62% | 10.63% |
| Net margin | 7.89% | 9.51% |
| ROE | 16.32% | N/A |
| ROIC | 14.60% | 31.32% |
Dividends
| Metric | CVCO | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.20% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 17.49% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CVCO | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.93% | 0.05% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 23.90% | 7.90% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.45% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.30% | 29.98% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CVCO or GTX?
- GTX has the lower trailing P/E: CVCO trades at 25.01 and GTX at 14.28. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CVCO or GTX?
- Over the past five years, CVCO grew revenue faster — CVCO at a 14.93% CAGR versus GTX at 0.05%.
- Does CVCO or GTX pay a bigger dividend?
- GTX pays a dividend (1.20% yield), while CVCO has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CVCO or GTX more profitable?
- GTX runs the higher net margin — CVCO at 7.89% versus GTX at 9.51%.
- How have CVCO and GTX total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CVCO delivered 19.30% and GTX delivered 29.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cavco Industries P/E ratioGarrett Motion P/E ratioGarrett Motion dividend yieldCavco Industries ROEGarrett Motion ROECavco Industries operating marginGarrett Motion operating marginCavco Industries revenue growthGarrett Motion revenue growthCavco Industries free cash flowGarrett Motion free cash flow
Cavco Industries & Garrett Motion appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.