Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) vs Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX)

A side-by-side comparison of Cavco Industries, Inc. and Garrett Motion Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CVCO vs GTX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y
CVCO +130.6% (+11.0%/yr)GTX +43.5% (+4.6%/yr)CVCO compounded faster over this window
0100200Start $1002020202220242026$231$144
CVCO GTX

CVCO vs GTX: by the numbers

  • •GTX is the larger company ($4.87B vs $4.43B market cap).
  • •GTX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.28 vs 25.01 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •GTX converts more revenue to profit (9.51% vs 7.89% net margin).
  • •CVCO grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.93% vs 0.05% CAGR).
  • •GTX pays a dividend (1.20% yield), while CVCO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCVCOGTX
P/E ratio25.0114.28
Forward P/E25.4813.18
PEG ratio1.051.86
P/S ratio1.931.30
P/B ratio3.99N/A
EV / EBITDA17.2112.21
FCF yield5.30%7.49%

Profitability

MetricCVCOGTX
Gross margin23.15%19.47%
Operating margin9.62%10.63%
Net margin7.89%9.51%
ROE16.32%N/A
ROIC14.60%31.32%

Dividends

MetricCVCOGTX
Dividend yieldN/A1.20%
Payout ratioN/A17.49%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCVCOGTX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)14.93%0.05%
EPS CAGR (5Y)23.90%7.90%
FCF CAGR (5Y)20.45%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)19.30%29.98%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CVCO or GTX?
GTX has the lower trailing P/E: CVCO trades at 25.01 and GTX at 14.28. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CVCO or GTX?
Over the past five years, CVCO grew revenue faster — CVCO at a 14.93% CAGR versus GTX at 0.05%.
Does CVCO or GTX pay a bigger dividend?
GTX pays a dividend (1.20% yield), while CVCO has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CVCO or GTX more profitable?
GTX runs the higher net margin — CVCO at 7.89% versus GTX at 9.51%.
How have CVCO and GTX total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, CVCO delivered 19.30% and GTX delivered 29.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.