Is CUBE or TRNO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, TRNO is cheaper: CUBE trades at a 28.77 P/E and TRNO at 16.09.

Which has grown faster, CUBE or TRNO?

Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — CUBE at a 9.95% CAGR versus TRNO at 20.57%.

Does CUBE or TRNO pay a bigger dividend?

CUBE yields 5.14% and TRNO yields 3.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CUBE or TRNO more profitable?

TRNO runs the higher net margin — CUBE at 28.93% versus TRNO at 86.52%.

Which has been the better investment, CUBE or TRNO?

Over the past 10-year, TRNO delivered the higher annualized total return — CUBE at 7.68% versus TRNO at 12.95%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CubeSmart (CUBE) vs Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO)

TRNO leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of CubeSmart and Terreno Realty Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Terreno Realty Corporation

$6.98B

$65.65Real Estate

Total return — CUBE vs TRNO

growth of $100 · last 16y

CUBE +507.0%TRNO +252.0%CUBE compounded faster

CUBE TRNO

CUBE vs TRNO: by the numbers

•CUBE is the larger company ($9.27B vs $6.98B market cap).
•TRNO trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.09 vs 28.77 P/E).
•TRNO converts more revenue to profit (86.52% vs 28.93% net margin).
•TRNO grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.57% vs 9.95% CAGR).
•CUBE pays the higher dividend yield (5.14% vs 3.12%).

Which is better, CUBE or TRNO?

Metric tally: CUBE 5 · TRNO 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTRNO(lower P/E)

GrowthTRNO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeCUBE(higher dividend yield)

QualityCUBE(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CUBE	TRNO
P/E ratio	28.77	16.09●
Forward P/E	27.25●	39.08
P/S ratio	8.24●	14.09
P/B ratio	3.52	1.61●
PEG ratio	2.52	0.14●
EV / EBITDA	18.13	13.52●

Profitability

Metric	CUBE	TRNO
Gross margin	11.86%	63.89%●
Operating margin	39.51%	40.81%●
Net margin	28.93%	86.52%●
ROE	12.36%●	9.88%
ROIC	6.76%●	3.66%

Dividends

Metric	CUBE	TRNO
Dividend yield	5.14%●	3.12%
Payout ratio	143.84%	52.16%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CUBE	TRNO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.95%	20.57%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.43%	35.52%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.58%	2.81%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CUBE or TRNO?: It depends on your goal. value: TRNO (lower P/E); growth: TRNO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CUBE (higher dividend yield); quality: CUBE (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRNO leads 10 to 5.
Is CUBE or TRNO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, TRNO is cheaper: CUBE trades at a 28.77 P/E and TRNO at 16.09.
Which has grown faster, CUBE or TRNO?: Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — CUBE at a 9.95% CAGR versus TRNO at 20.57%.
Does CUBE or TRNO pay a bigger dividend?: CUBE yields 5.14% and TRNO yields 3.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CUBE or TRNO more profitable?: TRNO runs the higher net margin — CUBE at 28.93% versus TRNO at 86.52%.
Which has been the better investment, CUBE or TRNO?: Over the past 10-year, TRNO delivered the higher annualized total return — CUBE at 7.68% versus TRNO at 12.95%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CUBE analysis Full TRNO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CubeSmart P/E ratio Terreno Realty P/E ratio CubeSmart dividend yield Terreno Realty dividend yield CubeSmart ROE Terreno Realty ROE CubeSmart operating margin Terreno Realty operating margin CubeSmart revenue growth Terreno Realty revenue growth CubeSmart free cash flow Terreno Realty free cash flow

CubeSmart & Terreno Realty appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.