Lionheart Holdings (CUB) vs New Providence Acquisition Corp. III (NPAC)

A side-by-side comparison of Lionheart Holdings and New Providence Acquisition Corp. III across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CUB vs NPAC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1y
CUB +4.8% (+4.8%/yr)NPAC +4.5% (+4.5%/yr)CUB compounded faster over this window
100102104106Start $1002026$105$104
CUB NPAC

CUB vs NPAC: by the numbers

  • •NPAC is the larger company ($326M vs $321M market cap).
  • •NPAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (43.54 vs 198.18 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCUBNPAC
P/E ratio198.1843.54
P/B ratio1.68N/A

Profitability

MetricCUBNPAC
Gross margin0.00%0.00%
Operating margin0.00%0.00%
Net margin0.00%0.00%
ROE0.95%N/A
ROIC-3.70%-0.74%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CUB or NPAC?
NPAC has the lower trailing P/E: CUB trades at 198.18 and NPAC at 43.54. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.