Lionheart Holdings (CUB) vs NewtekOne, Inc. (NEWT)

A side-by-side comparison of Lionheart Holdings and NewtekOne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CUB vs NEWT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 2y
CUB +9.1% (+4.5%/yr)NEWT +5.5% (+2.7%/yr)CUB compounded faster over this window
80100120140Start $10020252026$109$105
CUB NEWT

CUB vs NEWT: by the numbers

  • •NEWT is the larger company ($324M vs $321M market cap).
  • •NEWT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (4.75 vs 198.18 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •NEWT is profitable (19.32% net margin) while CUB runs a net loss (0.00%).
  • •NEWT pays a dividend (8.49% yield), while CUB is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCUBNEWT
P/E ratio198.184.75
Forward P/EN/A5.55
PEG ratioN/A0.58
P/S ratioN/A0.96
P/B ratio1.680.89

Profitability

MetricCUBNEWT
Gross margin0.00%N/A
Operating margin0.00%47.76%
Net margin0.00%19.32%
ROE0.95%15.83%
ROIC-3.70%N/A

NewtekOne, Inc.: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

MetricCUBNEWT
Dividend yieldN/A8.49%
Payout ratioN/A40.25%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCUBNEWT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A20.77%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A8.58%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A-10.00%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CUB or NEWT?
NEWT has the lower trailing P/E: CUB trades at 198.18 and NEWT at 4.75. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Does CUB or NEWT pay a bigger dividend?
NEWT pays a dividend (8.49% yield), while CUB is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is CUB or NEWT more profitable?
NEWT runs the higher net margin — CUB at 0.00% versus NEWT at 19.32%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.