Which has the lower trailing P/E, CTSH or ZM?

ZM has the lower trailing P/E: CTSH trades at 12.90 and ZM at 8.87. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CTSH or ZM?

Over the past five years, ZM grew revenue faster — CTSH at a 4.44% CAGR versus ZM at 6.54%.

Does CTSH or ZM pay a bigger dividend?

CTSH pays a dividend (2.23% yield), while ZM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CTSH or ZM more profitable?

ZM runs the higher net margin — CTSH at 10.26% versus ZM at 65.19%.

How have CTSH and ZM total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CTSH delivered -3.60% and ZM delivered -20.13% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) vs Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM)

A side-by-side comparison of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation and Zoom Communications, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CTSH

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

$27.03B

$60.00TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Zoom Communications, Inc.

$28.02B

$95.57TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CTSH vs ZM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

CTSH -2.8% (-0.4%/yr)ZM +55.1% (+6.5%/yr)ZM compounded faster over this window

CTSH ZM

CTSH vs ZM: by the numbers

•ZM is the larger company ($28.02B vs $27.03B market cap).
•ZM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.87 vs 12.90 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ZM converts more revenue to profit (65.19% vs 10.26% net margin).
•ZM grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.54% vs 4.44% CAGR).
•CTSH pays a dividend (2.23% yield), while ZM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CTSH	ZM
P/E ratio	12.90	8.87
Forward P/E	10.43	15.55
P/S ratio	1.25	5.61
P/B ratio	1.87	2.48
EV / EBITDA	N/A	19.55
FCF yield	9.61%	6.87%

Profitability

Metric	CTSH	ZM
Gross margin	32.00%	77.30%
Operating margin	15.76%	23.73%
Net margin	10.26%	65.19%
ROE	15.35%	28.80%
ROIC	12.43%	8.02%

Dividends

Metric	CTSH	ZM
Dividend yield	2.23%	N/A
Payout ratio	27.96%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CTSH	ZM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.44%	6.54%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.07%	21.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-2.21%	2.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-3.60%	-20.13%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CTSH or ZM?: ZM has the lower trailing P/E: CTSH trades at 12.90 and ZM at 8.87. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CTSH or ZM?: Over the past five years, ZM grew revenue faster — CTSH at a 4.44% CAGR versus ZM at 6.54%.
Does CTSH or ZM pay a bigger dividend?: CTSH pays a dividend (2.23% yield), while ZM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CTSH or ZM more profitable?: ZM runs the higher net margin — CTSH at 10.26% versus ZM at 65.19%.
How have CTSH and ZM total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CTSH delivered -3.60% and ZM delivered -20.13% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CTSH analysis Full ZM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cognizant Technology Solutions P/E ratio Zoom Communications P/E ratio Cognizant Technology Solutions dividend yield Cognizant Technology Solutions ROE Zoom Communications ROE Cognizant Technology Solutions operating margin Zoom Communications operating margin Cognizant Technology Solutions revenue growth Zoom Communications revenue growth Cognizant Technology Solutions free cash flow Zoom Communications free cash flow

Cognizant Technology Solutions & Zoom Communications appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.