Which has the lower trailing P/E, CTAS or WM?

WM has the lower trailing P/E: CTAS trades at 40.25 and WM at 29.90. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CTAS or WM?

Over the past five years, CTAS grew revenue faster — CTAS at a 9.62% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.

Does CTAS or WM pay a bigger dividend?

CTAS yields 0.89% and WM yields 1.64% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CTAS or WM more profitable?

CTAS runs the higher net margin — CTAS at 17.75% versus WM at 11.12%.

How have CTAS and WM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CTAS delivered 22.94% and WM delivered 15.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cintas Corporation (CTAS) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

A side-by-side comparison of Cintas Corporation and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CTAS

Cintas Corporation

$79.09B

$197.64IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Waste Management, Inc.

$84.38B

$211.10IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CTAS vs WM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CTAS +662.7% (+22.5%/yr)WM +308.8% (+15.1%/yr)CTAS compounded faster over this window

CTAS WM

CTAS vs WM: by the numbers

•WM is the larger company ($84.38B vs $79.09B market cap).
•WM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.90 vs 40.25 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CTAS converts more revenue to profit (17.75% vs 11.12% net margin).
•CTAS grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.62% vs 9.22% CAGR).
•WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.64% vs 0.89%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CTAS	WM
P/E ratio	40.25	29.90
Forward P/E	35.92	26.03
P/S ratio	7.02	3.29
P/B ratio	15.39	8.50
EV / EBITDA	26.13	13.80
FCF yield	2.38%	4.23%

Profitability

Metric	CTAS	WM
Gross margin	50.67%	35.04%
Operating margin	23.14%	18.54%
Net margin	17.75%	11.12%
ROE	38.91%	28.74%
ROIC	23.53%	9.01%

Dividends

Metric	CTAS	WM
Dividend yield	0.89%	1.64%
Payout ratio	36.66%	50.14%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CTAS	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.62%	9.22%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.58%	13.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.10%	7.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.89%	8.67%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CTAS or WM?: WM has the lower trailing P/E: CTAS trades at 40.25 and WM at 29.90. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CTAS or WM?: Over the past five years, CTAS grew revenue faster — CTAS at a 9.62% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.
Does CTAS or WM pay a bigger dividend?: CTAS yields 0.89% and WM yields 1.64% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CTAS or WM more profitable?: CTAS runs the higher net margin — CTAS at 17.75% versus WM at 11.12%.
How have CTAS and WM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CTAS delivered 22.94% and WM delivered 15.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CTAS analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cintas P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Cintas dividend yield Waste Management dividend yield Cintas ROE Waste Management ROE Cintas operating margin Waste Management operating margin Cintas revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Cintas free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Cintas & Waste Management appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.