Which has the lower trailing P/E, CTAS or VRT?

CTAS has the lower trailing P/E: CTAS trades at 43.77 and VRT at 67.73. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CTAS or VRT?

Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — CTAS at a 9.62% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.

Does CTAS or VRT pay a bigger dividend?

CTAS yields 0.84% and VRT yields 0.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CTAS or VRT more profitable?

CTAS runs the higher net margin — CTAS at 17.75% versus VRT at 14.37%.

How have CTAS and VRT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CTAS delivered 24.34% and VRT delivered 57.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cintas Corporation (CTAS) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

A side-by-side comparison of Cintas Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CTAS

Cintas Corporation

$87.10B

$217.66IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 2:40 PM EDT

VRT

Vertiv Holdings Co

$84.95B

$221.16IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 2:35 PM EDT

Total return — CTAS vs VRT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

CTAS +346.8%VRT +2651.0%VRT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CTAS VRT

CTAS vs VRT: by the numbers

•CTAS is the larger company ($87.10B vs $84.95B market cap).
•CTAS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (43.77 vs 67.73 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CTAS converts more revenue to profit (17.75% vs 14.37% net margin).
•VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 9.62% CAGR).
•CTAS pays the higher dividend yield (0.84% vs 0.08%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CTAS	VRT
P/E ratio	43.77	67.73
Forward P/E	43.90	41.55
P/S ratio	7.71	9.75
P/B ratio	16.90	24.90
PEG ratio	3.18	0.28
EV / EBITDA	29.88	45.36
FCF yield	2.16%	2.18%

Profitability

Metric	CTAS	VRT
Gross margin	50.67%	36.16%
Operating margin	23.14%	18.54%
Net margin	17.75%	14.37%
ROE	38.91%	36.71%
ROIC	23.39%	18.55%

Dividends

Metric	CTAS	VRT
Dividend yield	0.84%	0.08%
Payout ratio	36.22%	6.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CTAS	VRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.62%	18.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.58%	79.41%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.10%	41.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.19%	57.89%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CTAS or VRT?: CTAS has the lower trailing P/E: CTAS trades at 43.77 and VRT at 67.73. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CTAS or VRT?: Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — CTAS at a 9.62% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
Does CTAS or VRT pay a bigger dividend?: CTAS yields 0.84% and VRT yields 0.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CTAS or VRT more profitable?: CTAS runs the higher net margin — CTAS at 17.75% versus VRT at 14.37%.
How have CTAS and VRT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CTAS delivered 24.34% and VRT delivered 57.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CTAS analysis Full VRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cintas P/E ratio Vertiv P/E ratio Cintas dividend yield Vertiv dividend yield Cintas ROE Vertiv ROE Cintas operating margin Vertiv operating margin Cintas revenue growth Vertiv revenue growth Cintas free cash flow Vertiv free cash flow

Cintas & Vertiv appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.