Which has the lower trailing P/E, CTAS or TT?

TT has the lower trailing P/E: CTAS trades at 40.27 and TT at 33.43. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CTAS or TT?

Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — CTAS at a 9.62% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.

Does CTAS or TT pay a bigger dividend?

CTAS yields 0.89% and TT yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CTAS or TT more profitable?

CTAS runs the higher net margin — CTAS at 17.75% versus TT at 13.28%.

How have CTAS and TT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CTAS delivered 22.94% and TT delivered 26.63% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cintas Corporation (CTAS) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)

A side-by-side comparison of Cintas Corporation and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CTAS

Cintas Corporation

$79.13B

$197.74IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 12:55 PM EDT

Trane Technologies plc

$97.02B

$440.94IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 12:55 PM EDT

Total return — CTAS vs TT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CTAS +662.7% (+22.5%/yr)TT +956.2% (+26.6%/yr)TT compounded faster over this window

CTAS TT

CTAS vs TT: by the numbers

•TT is the larger company ($97.02B vs $79.13B market cap).
•TT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.43 vs 40.27 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CTAS converts more revenue to profit (17.75% vs 13.28% net margin).
•TT grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.44% vs 9.62% CAGR).
•TT pays the higher dividend yield (0.92% vs 0.89%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CTAS	TT
P/E ratio	40.27	33.43
Forward P/E	35.94	28.87
P/S ratio	7.02	4.37
P/B ratio	15.40	11.22
EV / EBITDA	26.14	22.93
FCF yield	2.38%	3.70%

Profitability

Metric	CTAS	TT
Gross margin	50.67%	35.39%
Operating margin	23.14%	17.94%
Net margin	17.75%	13.28%
ROE	38.91%	34.11%
ROIC	23.53%	19.89%

Dividends

Metric	CTAS	TT
Dividend yield	0.89%	0.92%
Payout ratio	36.66%	31.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CTAS	TT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.62%	10.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.58%	29.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.10%	11.84%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.89%	19.98%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CTAS or TT?: TT has the lower trailing P/E: CTAS trades at 40.27 and TT at 33.43. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CTAS or TT?: Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — CTAS at a 9.62% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.
Does CTAS or TT pay a bigger dividend?: CTAS yields 0.89% and TT yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CTAS or TT more profitable?: CTAS runs the higher net margin — CTAS at 17.75% versus TT at 13.28%.
How have CTAS and TT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CTAS delivered 22.94% and TT delivered 26.63% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CTAS analysis Full TT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cintas P/E ratio Trane Technologies P/E ratio Cintas dividend yield Trane Technologies dividend yield Cintas ROE Trane Technologies ROE Cintas operating margin Trane Technologies operating margin Cintas revenue growth Trane Technologies revenue growth Cintas free cash flow Trane Technologies free cash flow

Cintas & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.