Which has the lower trailing P/E, CTAS or MMM?

MMM has the lower trailing P/E: CTAS trades at 40.52 and MMM at 29.25. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CTAS or MMM?

Over the past five years, CTAS grew revenue faster — CTAS at a 9.62% CAGR versus MMM at -6.23%.

Does CTAS or MMM pay a bigger dividend?

CTAS yields 0.89% and MMM yields 1.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CTAS or MMM more profitable?

CTAS runs the higher net margin — CTAS at 17.75% versus MMM at 11.90%.

How have CTAS and MMM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CTAS delivered 22.94% and MMM delivered 5.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cintas Corporation (CTAS) vs 3M Company (MMM)

A side-by-side comparison of Cintas Corporation and 3M Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CTAS

Cintas Corporation

$79.61B

$198.95IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MMM

3M Company

$84.92B

$164.66IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — CTAS vs MMM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CTAS +666.5% (+22.6%/yr)MMM +64.5% (+5.1%/yr)CTAS compounded faster over this window

CTAS MMM

CTAS vs MMM: by the numbers

•MMM is the larger company ($84.92B vs $79.61B market cap).
•MMM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.25 vs 40.52 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CTAS converts more revenue to profit (17.75% vs 11.90% net margin).
•CTAS grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.62% vs -6.23% CAGR).
•MMM pays the higher dividend yield (1.86% vs 0.89%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CTAS	MMM
P/E ratio	40.52	29.25
Forward P/E	36.16	18.41
P/S ratio	7.07	3.37
P/B ratio	15.49	28.77
EV / EBITDA	26.30	N/A
FCF yield	2.36%	4.69%

Profitability

Metric	CTAS	MMM
Gross margin	50.67%	39.40%
Operating margin	23.14%	19.01%
Net margin	17.75%	11.90%
ROE	38.91%	101.52%
ROIC	23.53%	14.64%

Dividends

Metric	CTAS	MMM
Dividend yield	0.89%	1.86%
Payout ratio	36.66%	54.53%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CTAS	MMM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.62%	-6.23%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.58%	-8.53%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.10%	-10.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.89%	5.48%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CTAS or MMM?: MMM has the lower trailing P/E: CTAS trades at 40.52 and MMM at 29.25. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CTAS or MMM?: Over the past five years, CTAS grew revenue faster — CTAS at a 9.62% CAGR versus MMM at -6.23%.
Does CTAS or MMM pay a bigger dividend?: CTAS yields 0.89% and MMM yields 1.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CTAS or MMM more profitable?: CTAS runs the higher net margin — CTAS at 17.75% versus MMM at 11.90%.
How have CTAS and MMM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CTAS delivered 22.94% and MMM delivered 5.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CTAS analysis Full MMM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cintas P/E ratio 3M P/E ratio Cintas dividend yield 3M dividend yield Cintas ROE 3M ROE Cintas operating margin 3M operating margin Cintas revenue growth 3M revenue growth Cintas free cash flow 3M free cash flow

Cintas & 3M appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.