Cintas Corporation (CTAS) vs Emerson Electric Co. (EMR)
EMR leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cintas Corporation and Emerson Electric Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CTAS vs EMR
growth of $100 · last 30yCTAS +3669.8%EMR +592.9%CTAS compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CTAS EMR
CTAS vs EMR: by the numbers
- •EMR is the larger company ($84.89B vs $67.88B market cap).
- •EMR trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.37 vs 35.79 P/E).
- •CTAS converts more revenue to profit (17.57% vs 13.35% net margin).
- •CTAS grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.83% vs 1.43% CAGR).
- •EMR pays the higher dividend yield (1.47% vs 1.06%).
Which is better, CTAS or EMR?
Metric tally: CTAS 8 · EMR 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueEMR(lower P/E)
GrowthCTAS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeEMR(higher dividend yield)
QualityCTAS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CTAS | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.79 | 34.37● |
| Forward P/E | 31.20 | 20.71● |
| P/S ratio | 6.26 | 4.57● |
| P/B ratio | 14.41 | 4.13● |
| PEG ratio | 3.08 | 1.77● |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.60 | 18.69● |
| FCF yield | 2.59% | 3.72%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CTAS | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.36% | 52.66%● |
| Operating margin | 22.95%● | 19.96% |
| Net margin | 17.57%● | 13.35% |
| ROE | 40.46%● | 12.04% |
| ROIC | 22.95%● | 7.26% |
Dividends
| Metric | CTAS | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 1.47%● |
| Payout ratio | 40.18% | 53.87% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CTAS | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.83%● | 1.43% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.48%● | 4.54% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.81%● | -0.23% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.47%● | 12.16% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CTAS or EMR?
- It depends on your goal. value: EMR (lower P/E); growth: CTAS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: EMR (higher dividend yield); quality: CTAS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EMR leads 9 to 8.
- Is CTAS or EMR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, EMR is cheaper: CTAS trades at a 35.79 P/E and EMR at 34.37.
- Which has grown faster, CTAS or EMR?
- Over the past five years, CTAS grew revenue faster — CTAS at a 9.83% CAGR versus EMR at 1.43%.
- Does CTAS or EMR pay a bigger dividend?
- CTAS yields 1.06% and EMR yields 1.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CTAS or EMR more profitable?
- CTAS runs the higher net margin — CTAS at 17.57% versus EMR at 13.35%.
- Which has been the better investment, CTAS or EMR?
- Over the past 10-year, CTAS delivered the higher annualized total return — CTAS at 23.15% versus EMR at 13.96%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cintas P/E ratioEmerson Electric P/E ratioCintas dividend yieldEmerson Electric dividend yieldCintas ROEEmerson Electric ROECintas operating marginEmerson Electric operating marginCintas revenue growthEmerson Electric revenue growthCintas free cash flowEmerson Electric free cash flow
Cintas & Emerson Electric appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.