Caesarstone Ltd. (CSTE) vs Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID)

A side-by-side comparison of Caesarstone Ltd. and Smith-Midland Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CSTE vs SMID

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
CSTE -91.5% (-21.8%/yr)SMID +560.7% (+20.8%/yr)SMID compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
1101001k10kStart $10020182020202220242026$9$661
CSTE SMID

CSTE vs SMID: by the numbers

  • •SMID is the larger company ($119M vs $97M market cap).
  • •SMID is profitable (8.63% net margin) while CSTE runs a net loss (-37.38%).
  • •SMID grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.86% vs -7.71% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCSTESMID
P/E ratioN/A15.32
PEG ratioN/A0.43
P/S ratio0.251.33
P/B ratio0.902.08
EV / EBITDAN/A7.81
FCF yieldN/A3.51%

Profitability

MetricCSTESMID
Gross margin19.70%23.46%
Operating margin-13.00%12.07%
Net margin-37.38%8.63%
ROE-132.42%13.55%
ROIC-23.38%10.19%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCSTESMID
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-7.71%11.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A35.86%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A0.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-24.98%7.87%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CSTE or SMID?
Over the past five years, SMID grew revenue faster — CSTE at a -7.71% CAGR versus SMID at 11.86%.
Is CSTE or SMID more profitable?
SMID runs the higher net margin — CSTE at -37.38% versus SMID at 8.63%.
How have CSTE and SMID total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, CSTE delivered -21.85% and SMID delivered 20.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.