Caesarstone Ltd. (CSTE) vs Namib Minerals (NAMM)

A side-by-side comparison of Caesarstone Ltd. and Namib Minerals across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CSTE vs NAMM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1y
CSTE +63.5% (+63.5%/yr)NAMM -88.6% (-88.6%/yr)CSTE compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
1101001kStart $1002026$163$11
CSTE NAMM

CSTE vs NAMM: by the numbers

  • •CSTE is the larger company ($98M vs $62M market cap).
  • •NAMM is profitable (125.43% net margin) while CSTE runs a net loss (-37.38%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCSTENAMM
P/E ratioN/A0.75
P/S ratio0.260.75
P/B ratio0.90N/A
EV / EBITDAN/A0.55
FCF yieldN/A4.95%

Profitability

MetricCSTENAMM
Gross margin19.70%41.45%
Operating margin-13.00%14.90%
Net margin-37.38%125.43%
ROE-132.42%N/A
ROIC-23.38%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricCSTENAMM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-7.71%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)-24.98%N/A

Frequently asked

Is CSTE or NAMM more profitable?
NAMM runs the higher net margin — CSTE at -37.38% versus NAMM at 125.43%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.