Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSL or RS?

CSL has the lower trailing P/E: CSL trades at 20.55 and RS at 22.56. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CSL or RS?

Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — CSL at a 3.75% CAGR versus RS at 8.57%.

Does CSL or RS pay a bigger dividend?

CSL yields 1.27% and RS yields 1.26% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CSL or RS more profitable?

CSL runs the higher net margin — CSL at 14.21% versus RS at 5.66%.

How have CSL and RS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CSL delivered 14.47% and RS delivered 20.46% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) vs Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS)

A side-by-side comparison of Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 21, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CSL

Carlisle Companies Incorporated

$14.88B

$367.68Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

$19.80B

$387.89Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CSL vs RS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CSL +285.7% (+14.5%/yr)RS +617.5% (+21.8%/yr)RS compounded faster over this window

CSL RS

CSL vs RS: by the numbers

•RS is the larger company ($19.80B vs $14.88B market cap).
•CSL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.55 vs 22.56 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CSL converts more revenue to profit (14.21% vs 5.66% net margin).
•RS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.57% vs 3.75% CAGR).
•CSL pays the higher dividend yield (1.27% vs 1.26%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CSL	RS
P/E ratio	20.55	22.56
Forward P/E	16.99	16.82
P/S ratio	2.86	1.27
P/B ratio	9.02	2.71
EV / EBITDA	13.83	14.31
FCF yield	5.94%	2.69%

Profitability

Metric	CSL	RS
Gross margin	35.26%	26.89%
Operating margin	19.97%	7.88%
Net margin	14.21%	5.66%
ROE	44.80%	12.09%
ROIC	14.71%	9.36%

Dividends

Metric	CSL	RS
Dividend yield	1.27%	1.26%
Payout ratio	26.35%	34.83%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CSL	RS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.75%	8.57%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.18%	19.64%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.16%	-1.79%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.82%	22.86%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSL or RS?: CSL has the lower trailing P/E: CSL trades at 20.55 and RS at 22.56. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CSL or RS?: Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — CSL at a 3.75% CAGR versus RS at 8.57%.
Does CSL or RS pay a bigger dividend?: CSL yields 1.27% and RS yields 1.26% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CSL or RS more profitable?: CSL runs the higher net margin — CSL at 14.21% versus RS at 5.66%.
How have CSL and RS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CSL delivered 14.47% and RS delivered 20.46% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CSL analysis Full RS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Carlisle Companies P/E ratio Reliance Steel & Aluminum P/E ratio Carlisle Companies dividend yield Reliance Steel & Aluminum dividend yield Carlisle Companies ROE Reliance Steel & Aluminum ROE Carlisle Companies operating margin Reliance Steel & Aluminum operating margin Carlisle Companies revenue growth Reliance Steel & Aluminum revenue growth Carlisle Companies free cash flow Reliance Steel & Aluminum free cash flow

Carlisle Companies & Reliance Steel & Aluminum appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 21, 2026.