Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSL or RPM?

RPM has the lower trailing P/E: CSL trades at 19.02 and RPM at 18.43. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CSL or RPM?

Over the past five years, RPM grew revenue faster — CSL at a 3.75% CAGR versus RPM at 5.19%.

Does CSL or RPM pay a bigger dividend?

CSL yields 1.37% and RPM yields 2.18% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CSL or RPM more profitable?

CSL runs the higher net margin — CSL at 14.21% versus RPM at 8.41%.

How have CSL and RPM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CSL delivered 13.66% and RPM delivered 8.48% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) vs RPM International Inc. (RPM)

A side-by-side comparison of Carlisle Companies Incorporated and RPM International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CSL

Carlisle Companies Incorporated

$13.40B

$331.03Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

RPM

RPM International Inc.

$12.17B

$95.30Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CSL vs RPM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CSL +260.8% (+13.7%/yr)RPM +147.1% (+9.5%/yr)CSL compounded faster over this window

CSL RPM

CSL vs RPM: by the numbers

•CSL is the larger company ($13.40B vs $12.17B market cap).
•RPM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.43 vs 19.02 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CSL converts more revenue to profit (14.21% vs 8.41% net margin).
•RPM grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.19% vs 3.75% CAGR).
•RPM pays the higher dividend yield (2.18% vs 1.37%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CSL	RPM
P/E ratio	19.02	18.43
Forward P/E	15.77	15.94
PEG ratio	0.79	3.09
P/S ratio	2.63	1.55
P/B ratio	8.28	3.68
EV / EBITDA	12.85	11.54
FCF yield	6.47%	5.55%

Profitability

Metric	CSL	RPM
Gross margin	35.26%	41.44%
Operating margin	19.97%	12.29%
Net margin	14.21%	8.41%
ROE	44.80%	19.97%
ROIC	14.71%	10.97%

Dividends

Metric	CSL	RPM
Dividend yield	1.37%	2.18%
Payout ratio	26.15%	41.78%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CSL	RPM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.75%	5.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.18%	5.94%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.16%	2.09%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.66%	6.75%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSL or RPM?: RPM has the lower trailing P/E: CSL trades at 19.02 and RPM at 18.43. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CSL or RPM?: Over the past five years, RPM grew revenue faster — CSL at a 3.75% CAGR versus RPM at 5.19%.
Does CSL or RPM pay a bigger dividend?: CSL yields 1.37% and RPM yields 2.18% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CSL or RPM more profitable?: CSL runs the higher net margin — CSL at 14.21% versus RPM at 8.41%.
How have CSL and RPM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CSL delivered 13.66% and RPM delivered 8.48% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CSL analysis Full RPM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Carlisle Companies P/E ratio RPM International P/E ratio Carlisle Companies dividend yield RPM International dividend yield Carlisle Companies ROE RPM International ROE Carlisle Companies operating margin RPM International operating margin Carlisle Companies revenue growth RPM International revenue growth Carlisle Companies free cash flow RPM International free cash flow

Carlisle Companies & RPM International appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.