Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) vs RPM International Inc. (RPM)
A side-by-side comparison of Carlisle Companies Incorporated and RPM International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 21, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
$367.68Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
RPM
RPM International Inc.
$108.63Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CSL vs RPM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCSL +285.7% (+14.5%/yr)RPM +147.9% (+9.5%/yr)CSL compounded faster over this window
CSL RPM
CSL vs RPM: by the numbers
- •CSL is the larger company ($14.88B vs $13.88B market cap).
- •CSL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.55 vs 21.34 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CSL converts more revenue to profit (14.21% vs 8.41% net margin).
- •RPM grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.19% vs 3.75% CAGR).
- •RPM pays the higher dividend yield (1.96% vs 1.27%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CSL | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.55 | 21.34 |
| Forward P/E | 16.99 | 20.04 |
| P/S ratio | 2.86 | 1.79 |
| P/B ratio | 9.02 | 4.25 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.83 | 13.02 |
| FCF yield | 5.94% | 4.80% |
Profitability
| Metric | CSL | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.26% | 41.44% |
| Operating margin | 19.97% | 12.29% |
| Net margin | 14.21% | 8.41% |
| ROE | 44.80% | 19.97% |
| ROIC | 14.71% | 10.97% |
Dividends
| Metric | CSL | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 1.96% |
| Payout ratio | 26.35% | 41.62% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CSL | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.75% | 5.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.18% | 5.94% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.16% | 2.09% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.82% | 7.53% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSL or RPM?
- CSL has the lower trailing P/E: CSL trades at 20.55 and RPM at 21.34. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CSL or RPM?
- Over the past five years, RPM grew revenue faster — CSL at a 3.75% CAGR versus RPM at 5.19%.
- Does CSL or RPM pay a bigger dividend?
- CSL yields 1.27% and RPM yields 1.96% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CSL or RPM more profitable?
- CSL runs the higher net margin — CSL at 14.21% versus RPM at 8.41%.
- How have CSL and RPM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CSL delivered 14.47% and RPM delivered 9.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carlisle Companies P/E ratioRPM International P/E ratioCarlisle Companies dividend yieldRPM International dividend yieldCarlisle Companies ROERPM International ROECarlisle Companies operating marginRPM International operating marginCarlisle Companies revenue growthRPM International revenue growthCarlisle Companies free cash flowRPM International free cash flow
Carlisle Companies & RPM International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 21, 2026.